Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Possibility of business cooperation in the selected Adriatic Sea ports
Issue: Vol. 13, No 3, 2020
Published date: 09-2020 (print) / 09-2020 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Mimo Draskovic
University of Montenegro

Radislav Jovovic
University of Montenegro

Marcin Rabe
University of Szczecin
Keywords: economic modeling, seaports, Koper, Rijeka, Bar
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-3/4
Index PUBMS: 16e99ab7-0d2d-11eb-a151-fa163e0fa1a0
Language: English
Pages: 64-71 (8)
JEL classification: L92, O18, R49
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?762,en_possibility-of-business-cooperation-in-the-selected-adriatic-sea-ports
Licenses:
Abstract

The subject of this paper is the analysis of perceptions of 210 respondents about the level of possible business cooperation between the three Adriatic seaports (Bar, Koper and Rijeka). The aim of the research is to assess the degree of negative impact of individual key influencing factors which are grouped in the model according to the principle of compatibility into three independent variables at the level of possible business cooperation (as dependent variables). It starts from the basic hypothesis that further development of these seaports, among other things, should be based on their greater business cooperation, because it can significantly increase their competitiveness (Juscius et al., 2020) in the wider region through better business and logistics competencies. The authors have also defined the auxiliary hypothesis that in order to establish the mentioned business cooperation, it is necessary to overcome many economic, political, institutional and other barriers (Gupta et al. 2019; Panikarova et al, 2020; Draskovic et al., 2020). The paper uses the method of multiple linear regression to determine the relationship between the dependent and the independent variables.

Bibliography

1. Balakrishnan, N., Render, B., & Stair, R.M. (2007). Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

2. Baran, J., & Górecka, A.K. (2019). Economic and environmental aspects of inland transport in EU countries, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1037-1059, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1578680

3. Bayraktar, N., (2019). Effectiveness of public investment on growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Eurasian Economic Review, 9(4), pp.421-457.

4. Bertskas, D.P., &Tsitsiklis, J.N. (2008). Introduction to probability, USA: Athena Scientific.

5. Brodzicki, T., Márquez-Ramos, L., & Umiński, S. (2018). The Investigation into Determinants of Regional Exports Base: Panel Analysis for Spanish and Polish Regions. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBE

6. Coakes, S.J. (2013). SPSS 20.0 for Windows - Analysis without Anguish, Willey Publishing, Inc.

7. Dorożyński, T., Świerkocki, J., & Urbaniak, W. (2018). Determinants of Investment Attractiveness of Polish Special Economic Zones. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(4), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060409

8. Draskovic, M. (2019). Perception of the Impact of Negative Externalities on the Logistics Development of Adriatic Seaports of Koper, Rijeka and Bar. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(50), 228-239.

9. Draskovic, V., Jovovic, J., Streimikiene, D., Bilan, S. (2020). Formal and Informal vs. Alternative Institutions. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(2), 193-201.

10. Gonzalez, M.M., Trujillo, L. (2009). Efficiency measurement in the port industry: A survey of the empirical evidence”. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 43(2), 157-192.

11. Gupta, R., Gozgor, G., Kaya, H., & Demir, E., 2019. Effects of geopolitical risks on trade flows: evidence from the gravity model. Eurasian Economic Review, 9(4), pp.515-530.

12. Juscius, V., Bogatova, J., & Draskovic, M. (2020). Evaluation Framework of Seaports' Competitiveness Increasing Projects. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(2), 49-58.

13. Kontošić-Pamić, R., & Belullo, A. (2018). Investments’ background of entrepreneurial zones in Croatia, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1590-1606, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1506707

14. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Halicka, L., Ejdys, J., Magruk, A., Ahmad, U.N.U. (2018). Determining the utility in management by using multi-criteria decision support tools: a review, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1666-1716, https://doi.org/1

15. Misztal, K. (2010). Organization and operation of sea ports, Gdansk: Gdansk University (in Poland).

16. Pallant, J. F. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

17. Panikarova, S., Vlasov, M., & Draskovic, M. (2020). Relationsheep between Social Business Entrepreneurship and Business Freedom: an Evidence from the Russian. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(3), 123-136.

18. Del Saz-Salazar, S., & Garcia-Menendez, L. (2016). Port Expansion and Negative Externalities: A Willingness to Accept Approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 43, 59-83.

19. Teles, D., & Schachtebeck, C. (2019). Entrepreneurial Orientation in South African Social Enterprises. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070305

20. Vlahinić-Lenz, N., Pavlić-Skender, H., & Adelajda-Mirković, P. (2018). The macroeconomic effects of transport infrastructure on economic growth: the case of Central and Eastern E.U. member states, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1953-1964

21. Vu, D., & Ho, T. (2020). Provincial Foreign Direct Investment Absorptive Capacity of Vietnam. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(2), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080201