Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Norms of Egality and the Gap between Attitudes and Behaviour amongst Polish Students: An Experimental Study
Issue: Vol. 10, No 3, 2017
Published date: 10-2017 (print) / 10-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Urszula Markowska-Przybyła
Wrocław University of Economics

David M. Ramsey
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Keywords: Experimental game theory, egality, intention-behaviour gap, social capital, Ultimatum Game, Poland
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-3/16
Index PUBMS: 18d864d1-f8f2-11e7-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 220-236 (17)
JEL classification: C70, C72
Website: http://www.economics-sociology.eu/?528,en_norms-of-egality-and-the-gap-between-attitudes-and-behaviour-amongst-polish-students-an-experimental-study
Licenses:
Abstract

Social norms and ideals play an important role in determining the attitudes and behaviour of individuals. However, in many scenarios adhering to such norms or ideals leads to an individual incurring costs. In such a case, a gap may appear between the attitudes (intentions) and the behaviour of an individual. This article considers the gap between declared and observed readiness to punish an individual seen to act unfairly on the basis an experimental version of the Ultimatum Game. The authors highlight the difficulties of analysing such a gap. This experimental game was played by a sample of 1540 Polish students of state universities in each of the 16 Polish regions. These participants also filled out a questionnaire regarding their social capital, as well as attitudes and beliefs related to inequality and reciprocation. An analysis of the behaviour of individuals is presented, together with a mathematical model describing the gap between behaviour and stated intentions.

Bibliography

1. Bond, T. G., Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge, Oxford, UK.

2. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press. Chicago, Illinois.

3. Dąbrowska, K., Skowron, M. (2015). Porównanie postaw przedsiębiorczych studentów studiów ekonomicznych, społecznych i humanistycznych. Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym, 4, 121-131.

4. Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape: health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

5. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., Rubin D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological), 39, 1-38.

6. Falk, A., Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293-315.

7. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publishing, London, UK.

8. Gintis, H. (2003). The hitchhiker's guide to altruism: Gene-culture coevolution, and the internalization of norms. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 220(4), 407-418.

9. Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2015). Miasta największe pod względem liczby ludności. http://stat.gov.pl/statystyka-regionalna/rankingi-statystyczne/miasta-najwieksze-pod-wzgledem-liczby-ludnosci/ (accessed 18/4/2016).

10. Growiec, K. (2011). Kapitał społeczne: Geneza i społeczne konsekwencje. SWPS Academic Publishing, Warsaw.

11. Henrich, J. (2000). Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. Economic Review, 90(4), 973-979.

12. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, New York.

13. Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 351-367.

14. Kelley, C. T. (1999). Iterative methods for optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

15. Malinowska, A. (2015). Changes in Polish inequality 1989-2012: An analysis using the between-groups component of Theil's T-statistic. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2763337.

16. Markowska-Przybyła, U., Ramsey, D. M. (2015a). A game theoretical study of generalised trust and reciprocation in Poland: II. A description of the study group. Operations Research and Decisions, 25(2), 51-73.

17. Markowska-Przybyła, U., Ramsey, D. M. (2015b). Social capital and Polish students’ behaviour in experimental games designed to illustrate cooperation. Economics and Sociology, 8(4), 191-206.

18. Markowska-Przybyła, U., Ramsey, D. M. (2016). The Association between Social Capital and Membership of Organisations Amongst Polish Students. Economics & Sociology, 9(4), 305-321.

19. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

20. Platje, J. (2004). Institutional change and Poland’s economic performance since the 1970s: incentives and transaction costs. CL Consulting and Logistics, Wrocław.

21. Powell, M. J. D. (1998). Direct search algorithms for optimization calculations. Acta Numerica, 7, 287-336.

22. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

23. Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068-1095.

24. Woźniak, M. G. (2016). The Fundamental Characteristics of Social Inequality in Poland in the Context of Economic Development. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 47(3), 9-24.

25. Wrzesień, W. (2016). Kilka uwag o pokoleniowej sytuacji współczesnej polskiej młodzieży. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 78(1), 229-241.