Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: The Post-Keynesian view on labour demand in micro- and macroeconomic fields
Issue: Vol. 12, No 2, 2019
Published date: 06-2019 (print) / 06-2019 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Eduardo Fernández-Huerga
University of León

Jorge Garcia-Arias
University of León
Keywords: labour demand, Post-Keynesian economics, labour economics, level of employment, wages
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-2/7
Index PUBMS: 220153f8-ad48-11e9-bbfd-fa163e0fa1a0
Language: English
Pages: 109-128 (20)
JEL classification: J23, E24, B59
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?667,en_the-post-keynesian-view-on-labour-demand-in-micro-and-macroeconomic-fields
Licenses:
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the main ideas that could form the core of the Post-Keynesian approach to the analysis of labour demand at both micro- and macroeconomic levels. Specifically, this paper first reviews the essential elements characterising the Post-Keynesian approach to microeconomic analysis of labour demand. To do this, the "traditional view" is first presented, associated with the concept of the firm characterised by the presence of fixed technical coefficients and capacity reserves, and then the essential features of an alternative and more innovative view are described, based on the concept of the firm that emanates from the competence-based theories of organisation. Subsequently, the core of the Post-Keynesian contributions at the macroeconomic level is presented, organising them into two sections: first, those contributions that break away from the "second classical postulate" and second, those that additionally steer away from the "first classical postulate". Finally, the paper summarizes the main ideas that could be the core of the post-Keynesian approach to the analysis of labour demand, both in micro- and macroeconomic fields.

Bibliography

1. Allain, O. (2009). Effective demand and short-term adjustment in the General Theory. Review of Political Economy, 21, 1-22.

2. Andini, C. (2009). Teaching Keynes’s Principle of Effective Demand within the Real Wage vs. Employment Space. Forum for Social Economics, 38, 209-228.

3. Appelbaum, E. (1979). The Labor Market in the Postkeynesian Theory. Challenge, 22, 39-47.

4. Asimakopulos, A. (1975). A Kaleckian theory of income distribution. Canadian Journal of Economics, 8(3), 313-333.

5. Augier M. & Teece D.J. (2007). Competencies, capabilities and the neo-Schumpeterian tradition. In Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (Eds), Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics (pp. 267-286). Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar.

6. Dalziel, P. & Lavoie, M. (2003). Teaching Keynes’s Principle of Effective Demand Using the Aggregate Labor Market Diagram. The Journal of Economic Education, 34(4), 333-340.

7. Davidson, P. (1983). The Marginal Product Curve is Not the Demand Curve for Labor and the Lucas’s Labor Supply Function is Not the Supply Curve for Labor in the Real World. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6(1), 105-117.

8. Davidson, P. (1992). Would Keynes Be a New Keynesian? Eastern Economic Journal, 18(4), 449-463.

9. Davidson, P. (1994). Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

10. Davidson, P. (1998). Post Keynesian employment analysis and the macroeconomics of OECD unemployment. Economic Journal, 108(448), 817-831.

11. Davidson, P. (1999). Keynes’s Principle of Effective Demand versus the Bedlam of the New Keynesians. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 21(4), 571-588.

12. Davidson, P. (2011). Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory, Second Edition. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar

13. Dow, S.C. (1990). Beyond Dualism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(2), 143-157.

14. Downward, P. (2000). A Realist Appraisal of Post-Keynesian Pricing Theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(2), 211-214.

15. Dunn, S.P. (2000a). Fundamental Uncertainty and the Firm in the Long Run. Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 419-33.

16. Dunn, S.P. (2000b). Wither Post Keynesianism? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 22(3), 343-364.

17. Eichner, A.S. (1976). The Megacorp and Oligopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Eichner, A.S. (1979). An Anthropogenic Approach to Labor Economics. Eastern Economic Journal, 5(4), 349-366.

19. Eichner, A.S. (1985). Toward a New Economics: Essays in Post-Keynesian and Institutionalist Theory. New York: M.E. Sharp.

20. Eichner, A.S. (1987). The Macrodynamics of Advanced Market Economies. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharp.

21. Fernández-Huerga, E. (2008). The Economic Behavior of Human Beings: The Institutional/Post-Keynesian Model. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(3), 709-726.

22. Fernández-Huerga, E. (2019). The Labour Demand of Firms: An Alternative Conception Based on the Capabilities Approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(1), 37-60.

23. Fleetwood, S. (2006). Re-Thinking Labour Markets: A Critical Realist-Socioeconomic Perspective. Capital and Class, 89, 59-89.

24. Fleetwood, S. (2014). Conceptualizing Future Labour Markets”. Journal of Critical Realism, 13(3), 233-260.

25. Foss, N.J. (1993). Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2), 127-144.

26. Foss, N.J. (1997). The Resource-Based Perspective: An Assessment and Diagnosis of Problems. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Working Paper No. 97-1.

27. Harris, D.J. (1974). The price policy of firms, the level of employment and the distribution of income in the short run. Australian Economic Papers, 13(22), 144-151.

28. Hartwig, J. (2006). Explaining the aggregate price level with Keynes’s principle of effective demand. Review of Social Economy, 64(4), 469-492.

29. Heise, A. (2018). Reconciling Facts with Fiction, or: A Theoretical Speculation of why the Minimum Wage has no Discernible Effect on Employment. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 7(3), 1-23.

30. Hodgson, G.M. (1998a). The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166-192.

31. Hodgson, G.M. (1998b). On the Evolution of Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(3), 415-431.

32. Hodgson, G.M. (1998c). Evolutionary and Competence-Based Theories of the Firm. Journal of Economic Studies, 25(1), 25-56.

33. Hodgson, G.M. (2003). The Hidden Persuaders: Institutions and Individuals in Economic Theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 159-175.

34. Kaldor, N. (1970). Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Kaldor. Review of Economic Studies, 37(1), 1-7.

35. Kaldor, N. (1975). Economics Without Equilibrium. Oxford: Blackwell.

36. Kalecki, M. (1954). Theory of Economic Dynamics. London: Allen&Unwin.

37. Kalecki, M. (1971). Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

38. Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.

39. King, J.E. (1990). Labour Economics. London: Macmillan Education Ltd., 2nd. Ed.

40. King, J.E. (1996). The First Post Keynesian: Joan Robinson’s Essays in the Theory of Employment (1937). In Arestis, P. (Ed.), Employment, Economic Growth and the Tyranny of the Market. Essays in Honour of Paul Davidson. Volume Two (pp. 164-184). Cheltenha

41. King, J.E. (2002). Some Elements of a Post Keynesian Labour Economics. In Dow, S.C. & Hillard, J. (Eds) Keynes, Uncertainty and the Global Economy. Beyond Keynes. Volume Two (pp.68-87). Cheltenham-Brookfield: Edward Elgar.

42. Langlois, R.N., & Foss, N.J. (1999). Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization. Kyklos, 52(2), 201-208.

43. Lavoie, M. (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Aldershot-Brookfield: Edward Elgar.

44. Lavoie, M. (1996-1997). Real Wages, Employment Structure, and the Aggregate Demand Curve in a Kaleckian Short-Run Model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 19(2), 275-288.

45. Lavoie, M. (2001). Efficiency Wages in Kaleckian Models of Employment. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 23(3), 449-464

46. Lavoie, M. (2003). Real Wages and Unemployment with Effective and Notional Demand for Labor. Review of Radical political Economics, 35(2), 166-182.

47. Lavoie, M. (2015). Post-Keybnesian Economics. New Foundations. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar.

48. Lawson, T. (1994). The Nature of Post Keynesianism and Its Links to Other Traditions. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 16(4), 503-538.

49. Mongiovi, G. (1991). Keynes, Sraffa and the Labour Market. Review of Political Economy, 3(1), 25-42.

50. Moore, B. (1998). Why Wage and Price Flexibility is Destabilizing. In Arestis, P. (Ed.), Method, Theory and Policy in Keynes. Essays in Honour of Paul Davidson. Volume Three (pp. 125-146). Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar.

51. Nell, E.J. (1978). The simple theory of effective demand. Intermountain Economic Review, 9(2), 1-33.

52. Nell, E.J. (1984). Effective Demand, Real Wages and Employment. In Hagemann, H., & Heinz, D. (Eds.), Beschäftgung, Verteilung und Konjunktur: Festchrift für Adolph Lowe (pp. 132-159). Bremen: Bremen University.

53. Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

54. Palacio-Vera, A. (2009). Capital accumulation, technical progress and labour supply growth: Keynes’s approach to aggregate supply and demand analysis revisited. Review of Political Economy, 21, 23-49.

55. Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

56. Riach, P.A. (1995). Wage-Employment Determination in a Post-Keynesian World. In Arestis, P., & Marshall, M. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Full Employment (pp. 163-175). Aldershot-Brookfield: Edward Elgar.

57. Robinson, J. (1937). Essays in the Theory of Employment. London: MacMillan.

58. Robinson, J. (1954). The Production Function and the Theory of Capital. Review of Economic Studies, 21(2), 81-106.

59. Robinson, J. (1956). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.

60. Schefold, B. (1983). Kahn on Malinvaud. In Eatwell, J., & Milgate, M. (Eds.), Keynes Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (pp. 229-246). London: Duckworth.

61. Seccareccia, M. (1991). An Alternative to Labour-Market Orthodoxy: The Post-Keynesian/Institutionalist Policy View. Review of Political Economy, 3(1), 43-61.

62. Steindl, J. (1952). Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

63. Stockhammer, E. (2011). Wage norms, capital accumulation, and unemployment: a post-Keynesian view. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(2), 295-311.

64. Sylos Labini, P. (1971). La Théorie des Prix en Régime d’Oligopole et la Théorie Du Développement. Revue d’Economie Politique, 81(2), 244-272.

65. Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

66. Teece, D.J., & Pisano G.P. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556.

67. Thirlwall, A.P. (1993). The Renaissance of Keynesian Economics. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 46(186), 327-337.

68. Woodbury, S.A. (1987). Power in Labor Market: Institutionalist Approaches to Labor Problems. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(4), 1781-1807.