Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0

Microfirms play a significant role in the Central/Eastern European economies, comprising 86% of the total amount of active firms. Development of microfirms is influenced by the local entrepreneurial environment. This article discusses the role of the local formal (regulations, local acts of law) and informal (customs, social norms and values) institutions in the development of microfirms. Synthetic exploration of the coexistence of formal and informal institutions on the example of Masovian and Swietokrzyskie voivodeships in Poland has been carried out. To present a multifaceted perspective, the following research methods were used: a survey among formal local institutions, individual indepth interviews with microfirms’ owners and Regional Chambers of Commerce and also a case study on the local law acts. The findings suggest that the development instruments used by formal local institutions are inadequate for the needs of MF's. Furthermore, the crucial role of family support, and the importance of knowledge sharing has been found.


1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2002). Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1231-1294. doi: 10.1162/003355302320935025.

2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (385–472). Amsterdam: North Holland.

3. Argandona, A. (1991). Values, Institutions, and Ethics. University of Navarra, Working Papers 215. Retrieved June 4, 2017, from

4. Blomley, N.(1994). Law, Space and the Geographies of Power. New York and London: The Guilford Press.

5. Boettke, P. J., & Coyne C. J. (2009). Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 135–209. doi: 10.1561/0300000018.

6. Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., Kedar, A. (eds.) (2014). The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

7. Bruno, R. L., Bytchkova, M., & Saul E. (2008). Institutional Determinants of New Firm Entry in Russia: A Cross-Regional Analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1740-1749. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00322.

8. Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 213–225. doi: 10.1023/A:1007997102930.

9. Brycz B., & Dudycz, T. (2010). Case study jako popularna metoda w naukach o zarządzaniu. [Case study as a popular method in management science]. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 16(3), 23-31.

10. Busenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994-1003. doi:10.2307/1556423.

11. Central Statistical Office of Poland. (2016). Działalność gospodarcza przedsiębiorstw o liczbie pracujących do 9 osób w 2015 r. [Economic Activity of Enterprises employing up to 9 people in 2015]. Retrieved June 10, 2017, from

12. Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(3), 195-215. doi:10.1080/089856200413464.

13. Cierpniak-Szóstak, E. (2008). Wizerunek polskiego przedsiębiorcy jako element społecznej legitymizacji / delegitymizacji nowego ładu [„The Image of Entrepreneur in Poland as an Element of Social Legitimation/ Delegitimation of New System”]. Nierówności sp

14. Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (notified under document number C(2003) 1422). Retrieved June 4, 2017, from

15. Cox, D., Gagliardi, D., Monfardini, E., Cuvelier, S., Vidal, D., Laibarra, B., Probst, L., Schiersch, A., Mattes, A. (eds.). (2013). A Recovery on the Horizon?. Annual Report on European SMEs 2012/2013. Retrieved June 4, 2017, from http://th.enterprise-eu

16. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (1996). Values, beliefs and regional variations in new firm formation rates. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2-3), 179-199. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00004-4.

17. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6.

18. Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing?. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury.

19. Eurostat. (2016). Business demography by size class (from 2004 onwards, NACE Rev. 2). indicator code bd_9bd_sz_cl_r2. Retrieved May 6, 2017, from

20. Fogel, K., Hawk, A., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2008). Institutional Obstacles to Entrepreneurship. In M. Casson, B. Yeung, A. Basu, N. Wadesonet (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship (540-579). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21. Fuentelsaz, L., González, C., Maícas, J. P., & Montero, J. (2015). How different formal institutions affect opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 246–258. doi:10.1016/j.brq.2015.02.001.

22. Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social Capital and the Civil Society. IMF Working Paper WP/00/74. Retrieved June 4, 2017, from

23. Gartner, W. B., Birley, S. (2002). Introduction to the Special Issue on Qualitative Methods in Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 387-395. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00077-5.

24. Gertler, M. S. (1997). The invention of regional culture. In R. Lee, J. Willis (eds.), Geographies of Economies (47–58). London: Arnold.

25. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.

26. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2017). Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Attitudes. Retrieved May 6, 2017, from

27. Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, K. (1994). Environment for Entrepreneurship Development, Key Dimensions and Research Implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 43-62.

28. Gorynia, M. (1995). Teoria i polityka regulacji mezosystemów gospodarczych a transformacja post-socjalistycznej gospodarki polskiej [Theory and policy adjustment of economic mezo systems and transformation of post-socialist Polish economy]. Poznań: Wydawn

29. Gorzelak, G., Jałowiecki, B., Woodward, R., Dziemianowicz, W., Herbst, M., Roszkowski, W., & Zarycki, T. (1999). Dynamics and factors of local success in Poland. Regional and local studies 15, CASE and University of Warsaw, Warsaw. Retrieved April 12, 201

30. Graham, N. (2011). Lawscape. New York and London: Routledge.

31. Grodzicki, M. J. (2016). Construction of the development strategy versus informal constraints. Jagiellonian Journal of Management, 2(1), 21-33. doi:10.4467/2450114XJJM.16.002.5323.

32. Gutmann, J., & Voigt, S. (2016). The Rule of Law: Measurement and Deep Roots. ILE Working Paper Series No. 1. Retrieved May 6, 2017, from

33. Hayton, J. C., & Cacciotti, G. (2013). Is there an entrepreneurial culture? A review of empirical research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(9-10), 708-731. doi:10.1080/08985626.2013.862962.

34. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2003). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725-740. doi:10.1017/S1537592704040472.

35. Hindle, K. (2004). Choosing qualitative methods for entrepreneurial cognition research: A canonical development approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 575–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00065.x.

36. Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions?. Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.

37. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper 5430. Retrieved June 5, 2017, from

38. Kingsley, G., & Malecki, E. J. (2004). Networking for Competitiveness. Small Business Economics, 23(1), 71–84. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000026022.08180.b7.

39. Kłodziński, M. (2006). Aktywizacja społeczno-gospodarcza gmin wiejskich i małych miast [Activation of the socio-economic rural communities and small towns]. Warszawa: Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk.

40. Klyver, K., Foley, D. (2012). Networking and culture in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24(7-8), 561-588. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2012.710257.

41. Kostova, T. (1997). Country Institutional Profiles: Concept and Measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings, August, 180-184. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.1997.4981338.

42. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, London. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

43. Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Rialp, J. (2007). Regional Differences in the Influence of Role Models: Comparing the Entrepreneurial Process of Rural Catalonia. Regional Studies, 41(6), 779-796. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120247.

44. Littunen, Ha. (2000). Networks and Local Environmental Characteristics in the Survival of New Firms. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 59–71. doi: 10.1023/A:1026553424833.

45. Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional Environments for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 203-218. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00222.x.

46. Mitra, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

47. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

48. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

49. Nyström, K. (2008). Regional Institutional Environment and Swedish Regional New Firm Formation.. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No. 142. Retrieved June 5, 2017, from

50. Pike, A. (ed.) (2007). Whither regional studies?. London and New York: Routledge.

51. Phelps, E. S. (2013). Mass flourishing: how grassroots innovation created jobs, challenge, and change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

52. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

53. Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?. Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034-1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.

54. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of economic growth, 9(2), 131-165. doi:10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85.

55. Salimath, M. S., & Cullen, J. B. (2010). Formal and informal institutional effects on entrepreneurship: a synthesis of nation-level research. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(3), 358-385. doi:10.1108/19348831011062175.

56. Schwab, K. (ed.) (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. World Economic Forum. Retrieved May 6, 2017, from

57. Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

58. Serarols-Tarres, Ch., Urbano, D., & Vaillant, Y. (2007). Support systems for new enterprise formation in Catalonia: An institutional approach. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 1(3), 257-279. doi: 10.1504/IJBSR.2007.015829.

59. Skica, T., & Bem, A. (2008). Rola samorządu terytorialnego w procesach stymulowania przedsiębiorczości [The role of local governments in entrepreneurship development proces]. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 1(55), 79-92. doi: 10.7366/1509499515505.

60. Spencer, J. W., & Gómez, C. (2004). The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: a multicountry study. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1098– 1107. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00040

61. Storper, M. (1997). The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: The Guilford Press.

62. Storper, M. (2005). Society, community and economic development. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(4), 30–57. doi: 10.1007/BF02686164.

63. Streeck, W. (1991). On the institutional conditions of diversified quality production. In, E. Metzner, W. Streeck, (eds.), Beyond Keynesianism: Socio-Economics of Production and Full Employment (21–61). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

64. Sztompka, P. (2008). The Ambivalence of Social Change in Post-Communist Societies. In A. Śliz, M. S. Szczepański, (eds.), Czy koniec socjalizmu? [Is the end of socialism?]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.

65. Ustawa z dnia 2 lipca 2004 r. o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej (Dz. U. 2004 Nr 173 poz. 1807) [Law of 2nd July 2004 economic freedom activity in Poland]. Retrieved June 5, 2017, from

66. Voigt, S. (2013). How (not) to measure institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1017/S1744137412000148.

67. Wilkin, J. (2016). Instytucjonalne i kulturowe podstawy gospodarowania: Humanistyczna perspektywa ekonomii [Institutional and cultural economic base: Humanistic Perspective in Economics]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.

68. Williams, C. C., & Gurtoo, A. (eds.) (2017). Handbook of Entrepreneurship in Developing Economies. New York: Routledge.

69. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. doi: 10.1257/jel.38.3.595.

70. World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (2017). Retrieved June 5, 2017, from

71. World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010-2014). OFFICIAL AGGREGATE v.20150418. Retrieved October 10, 2013, from


73. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London. Sage Publications.