Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Socio-cultural capital as a cause of economic and institutional crisis in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina
Issue: Vol. 11, No 4, 2018
Published date: 12-2018 (print) / 12-2018 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Milica Delibasic
Mediterranean University
Keywords: socio-cultural capital, imposed impact factors, inherited impact factors, institutions, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/14
Index PUBMS: 39059482-18e3-11e9-82eb-fa163e6feac6
Language: English
Pages: 219-229 (11)
JEL classification: Z13
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?630,en_socio-cultural-capital-as-a-cause-of-economic-and-institutional-crisis-in-montenegro-serbia-and-bosnia-and-herzegovina
Licenses:
Abstract

The subject of the article is to explain aspects and essential elements through which socio-cultural capital causes crisis effects (institutional, economic, and social) in the selected post-socialist countries of South-Eastern Europe – Montenegro (MNE), Serbia (SER), and Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The aim of this paper is to: a) model the structure and the role of socio-cultural capital; b) draw attention to the negative impacts of path dependence and new neoliberal culture; and c) suggest a new methodological criterion for the division of integral components of socio-cultural capital (inherited and imposed factors), which affected its decline in those countries. Its starting hypothesis is that legacy factors (conditionally: path dependency) and imposed factors (external and internal origin) in the observed transition countries have caused an erosion of many socio-cultural contents, which has led to a slowdown in economic, institutional, and social growth. Besides common methods of social sciences, the survey method has been used. The survey results show that socio-cultural capital suffered a decline, mostly due to a stagnation of bridging social capital and an increase in linking social capital, that is, due to a greater impact of imposed factors (generated in the new neoliberal culture) than inherited factors.

Bibliography

1. Acemoglu, D. et al. (2003). Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Simptoms: Volatility, Crises and Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 49-123.

2. Andrushkiv, B., Vovk, Y., Pohaydak, O., & Fedyshyn, I. (2011). Crisis of relationship in general theory of crisis. Journal of International Studies, 4(1), 18-25.

3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

4. Bear, D. (1974). The university as a multi-product firm, in Effciency in universities: the La Paz Papers, Universityes of Heriot-Vot & Stenford, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

5. Becker, G. S. (1991), Human capital. Chicago.

6. Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d ́une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d ́ethnologie kabyle. Librairie Droz, Genèvе.

7. Bourdieu, P. (1986).The Forms of Capital, in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Ed. J. Richardson. N. Y., Greenwood, 241–258.

8. Butnaru, G.I., Mironiuc, M., Huian, C., Haller, A. P. (2018). Analysis of Economic Growth in Tourism Under the Impact of Terrorism and of the Waves of Refugees. Amfiteatru Economic, 20 (Special No. 12), 885-904.

9. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.

10. De Grof, J., Niv, G. & Sve, J. (1998). Democracy and governance in higher education. Kluwer Law International, Hag/London.

11. Delibasic, M. (2015). The Post-socialist Transition Through the Prism of O. Williamson’s Insigh. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 10(1), 13–24.

12. Delibasic, M. (2016). Hypothetical Matrix for Institutional Modeling of the Basis for Economic Development in the Countries of Southeast Europe. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(2), 147-159. 10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-1/9

13. Draskovic, M., Draskovic, V., Bilan, Y., & Delibasic, M. (2016). Quasi-Neoliberalism as Quasi Institutional Monisms and Causes of the Crisis in Southeastern Europe. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(2B), 755-765

14. Draskovic, M., Jovovic R., Draskovic V., & Streimikiene D. (2017). Erosion of Socio-Cultural Capital in South Eastern Europe. Sociological Studies, 7, 99-106.

15. Drachkovich, M.V., Drachkovich, V.D., Bilan, Yu.V. (2017). Social Institutional Factors оf Slow-Down: The Case оf South-East European Countries Development. Sociological Studies, 4, 107-115.

16. Draskovic, M, Jovovic, R., Draskovic, V. & Jovovic, N. (2017). Levels and factors of transitional crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Economics and Sociology, 10(2), 21-32. DOI: 10.14254/2071- 789X.2017/10-2/2

17. Draskovic, M., Bauk, Streimikiene & Draskovic, V. (2017). Testing the Level of Alternative Institutions as a Slowdown Factor of Economic Development: the Case of Montenegro. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(45), 477-492.

18. Draskovic, V. (2018). Clokotrization of tranzition – critical essays, Agharta Science Publishing House, Centre of Sociological Research, Szczecin.

19. Draskovic, V., Popov, E. & Peleckis, K.K. (2017). Modelling of Institutional Changes in Transition Countries - the Gap Between the Theory and Practice. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(1) 125-140.

20. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government: Implications for Policy and Evaluation, Working Paper 2002-11, Institutet för studier av utbildning och forskning, Stockholm.

21. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History? The National Interest, 89, 1-18.

22. Hodgson, G. (2007). What are institutions? Voprosy ekonomiki, 8, 28-48.

23. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

24. Jonson, H. G. (1974). The university and the social welfare: a taxonomic exercis, in Efficiency in universities: the La Paz Papers, Universityes Heriot-Vot & Stenford, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

25. Lakic, S., Draskovic, M. (2015). Implications of Institutional Dispositions of Neoliberalism. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 11(2), 113-124.

26. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Triple Helix Model, in Wilfred Dolfsma & Luc Soete (eds.). Understanding the Dynamics of a Knowledge Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 42-76.

27. Parsons, T. (1977). Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. The Free Press and Collier Macmillan, New York and London.

28. Paldam, M. (2000). Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(5), 629-653.

29. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its Origins and Application in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.

30. Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Journal of Democracy, January, 65-78.

31. Radjenovic, M. (2018). The Quality of Human Resources in Tourism and Hospitality Industry in Montenegro. Transformation in Business & Economics, 17(2/44), 86-94.

32. Radovic, D., Bauk, S., Draskovic, M., & Delibasic, M. (2018). Institutional Violence in the Countries of Southeast Europe. Transformation in Business & Economics, 17(2/44), 170-179.

33. Sorokin, P.A. (1992). Person. Civilization. Society. Politizdat, Moskow.

34. Thomas, W.I., & Thomas D.S. (1928), The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf, New York.

35. Vrânceanu, C.A., & Iorgulescu, C.M. (2016). A Look at Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions in Two Service Sectors from Romania. Amfiteatru Economic, 18(Special Issue No. 10), 875-884.

36. World Bank (1999). What is Social Capital?. Poverty Net. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/whatsc.htm

37. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes, Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11-17.

38. Yerznkyan, B., Gassner, L., & Kara, A. (2017). Culture, Institutions and Economic Performance. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(2), 71-80.