Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Reasons for Doing Good: Behavioural Explanations of Prosociality in Economics
Issue: Vol. 10, No 1, 2017
Published date: 03-2017 (print) / 03-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Magdalena Adamus
Cracow University of Economics
Keywords: behavioural economics, homo economicus, altruism, ultimatum game, dictator game
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/9
Index PUBMS: 3cc425a5-0041-11e8-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 122-134 (13)
JEL classification: A13, C91, D63, D64
Website: http://www.economics-sociology.eu/?475,en_reasons-for-doing-good-behavioural-explanations-of-prosociality-in-economics
Licenses:
Abstract

This paper discusses issues of altruism and prosocial behaviour within economics. The first part discusses relations between understanding of expected utility theory and features of an economic man. It also defines the most important properties of the game and provides some simple solutions. The second part includes a critical overview of selected and increasingly complex concepts explaining the phenomenon of prosocial behaviour. It begins with models focusing only on final allocations and ends with those studying the role of intentions, motivations and social status of agents. It also shows how needs, social conditions, norms and individual characteristics affect the propensity to behave prosocially.

Bibliography

1. Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P., Miller, L. M. (2008), Moral distance in dictator games, Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 344-354.

2. Akerlof, G. A. (2002), Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior, The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 411-433.

3. Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2002), Economics and Identity, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 715-753.

4. Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2010), Identity Economics. How our identities shape our work, wages, and well-being, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

5. Andreoni, J. (1990), Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving, The Economic Journal, Vol. 100, No. 401, pp. 464-477.

6. Andreoni, J., Bernheim, B. D. (2009), Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects, Econometrica, Vol. 5, pp. 1607-1636.

7. Andreoni, J., Rao, J. M., Trachtman, H. (2016), Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving, Journal of Political Economy, (in print).

8. Ariely, D., Bracha, A., Meier, S. (2009), Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivations and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially, American Economic Review, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 544-555.

9. Bénabou, R., Tirole, J. (2003), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, pp. 489-520.

10. Bénabou, R., Tirole, J. (2006), Incentives and Prosocial Behavior, The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1652-1678.

11. Blount, S. (1995), When Social Outcomes Aren’t Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 131-144.

12. Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A. (2000), ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition, The American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No.1, pp. 166-193.

13. Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A. (2005), A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility, Economic Theory, Vol. 25, pp. 957-982.

14. Brañas-Garza, P. (2006), Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 60, pp. 306-320.

15. Burnham, T. C. (2003), Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigating of anonymity and gift giving, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 50, pp. 133-144.

16. Burnham, T. C., McCabe, K., Smith, V. L. (2000), Friend-or foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 43, pp. 57-73.

17. Camerer, C. (2003), Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

18. Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M. (2006), Promises and Partnership, Econometrica, Vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 1579-1601.

19. Charness, G., Rabin, M. (2002), Understanding social preferences with simple tests, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 817-869.

20. Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., Shogren, J. F. (2002), Hardnose the Dictator, The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No.4, pp. 1218-1221.

21. Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., Insko, C. A. (2011), Introducing the GASP Scale: A New Measure of Guilt and Shame Proneness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 947-966.

22. Dixit, A. K., Nalebuff, B. J. (2009), Sztuka strategii. Teoria gier w biznesie i życiu prywatnym, Warszawa: MT Biznes.

23. Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J. (1996a), The relative of fairness: gender differences in punishment game, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 30, pp. 143-158.

24. Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J. (1996b), Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 181-191.

25. Engelman, D., Strobel, M. (2004), Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments, The American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 857-869.

26. Falk, A., Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. (2003), On the nature of fair behavior, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 20-26.

27. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. M. (1999), Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 817-868.

28. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E. (1994), Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6, pp. 347-369.

29. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., Moore, J. B. (2001), Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 46, pp. 271-290.

30. Glazer, A., Konrad, K. A. (1996), A Signalling Explanation for Charity, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 1019-1028.

31. Guala, F., Mittone, L. (2010), Paradigmatic experiments: The Dictator Game, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 39, pp. 578-584.

32. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B. (1982), An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3, pp. 367-388.

33. Haley, K. J., Fessler, D. M. T. (2005), Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game, Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 26, pp. 245-256.

34. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Smith, V .L. (1996), Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 653-660.

35. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., Thaler, R. H. (1986a), Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics, Journal of Business, Vol. 59, No.4, pp. 285-300.

36. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., Thaler, R. H. (1986b), Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 728-741.

37. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263-291.

38. Meier, S. (2007), A Survey of Economics Theories and Field Evidence on Pro-Social Behavior, In: B. S. Frey, A. Stutzer (ed.), Economics and Psychology. A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 51-88.

39. Mittone, L., Ploner, M. (2012), Asset Legitimacy and Distributive Justice in the Dictator Game: An Experimental Analysis, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 135-142.

40. Rabin, M. (1993), Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics, The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 5, pp. 1281-1302.

41. Rabin, M. (1998), Psychology and Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 11-46.

42. Rabin, M. (2002), A perspective on psychology and economics, European Economic Review, Vol. 46, pp. 657-685.

43. Rawls, J. (1994), Teoria sprawiedliwości, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

44. Ruffle, B. J. (1998), More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 247-265.

45. Selten, R. (1978), The equity principle in economic behavior, In: H. W. Gottinger, W. Leinfellner (ed.), Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice, Dordrecht : D. Reidel Publishing, pp. 289-301.

46. Solek, A. (2010), Ekonomia behawioralna a ekonomia neoklasyczna, Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego, Vol. 8, pp. 21-34.

47. Szarzec, K. (2014), Model homo oeconomicus w teorii makroekonomii głównego nurtu, In: U. Zagóra-Jonszta, R. Pęciak (ed.), Dokonania współczesnej myśli ekonomicznej: racjonalność, efektywność, etyka, Katowice: Wydawnictwo EU w Katowicach, pp. 195-204.

48. Thaler, R. H. (2000), From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 133-141.

49. Zizzo, D. J. (2011), Do Dictator Games Measure Altruism? CBESS Discussion Paper, Vol. 11, No. 15, pp. 1-9.