Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: A model proposal to determine a crowd-credit-scoring
Issue: Vol. 11, No 4, 2018
Published date: 12-2018 (print) / 12-2018 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Antonio Moreno-Moreno
Universidad de Sevilla

Emma Berenguer
Universidad Pablo de Olavide

Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa
Universidad de Sevilla, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Peru
Keywords: Crowdsourcing, crowdfunding, crowdlending, peer-to-peer, credit scoring
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/4
Index PUBMS: 4190d326-18df-11e9-82eb-fa163e6feac6
Language: English
Pages: 69-79 (11)
JEL classification: G23
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?620,en_a-model-proposal-to-determine-a-crowd-credit-scoring
Licenses:
Abstract

Crowdlending is gaining importance as a financial option and is democratizing access to capital markets. However, the key factors that drive investors to choose a given project requires further research. Some authors have identified certain isolated factors, but a holistic approach is needed. To fill this gap, we identified 10 success factors allowing us to build a crowdlending success model. The model leads to establishing the concept of crowd-credit-scoring, in others words, understanding which criteria “crowds” follow when lending money and how different these criteria are from those applied by banking executives. Results will be very useful to establish the crowd-credit-scoring concept. In others words, which are the criteria follow by the “crowd” to lend money and how different are this criteria to the banking executives’ ones.

Bibliography

1. Agrawal, A., Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding : Geography , Social Networks , and the Timing of Investment Decisions Crowdfunding : Geography , Social Networks , and the Timing of Investment Decisions, 24(May 2016), 253–274.

2. Assenova, V., Best, J., Cagney, M., Ellenoff, D., Karas, K., Moon, J., … Sorenson, O. (2016). The present and future of crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.125

3. Barasinska, N., & Schaefer, D. (2014). Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform. German Economic Review, 15(4), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12052

4. Beaulieu, T., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2015). A conceptual framework for understanding crowdfunding. Communications of the Association, (June). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3866&context=cais

5. Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective. Information Technology and Management, 15(4), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z

6. Chen, X., Zhou, L., & Wan, D. (2016). Group social capital and lending outcomes in the financial credit market: An empirical study of online peer-to-peer lending. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 15, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.20

7. Chiavaro, J., Saunderson, C., Chiavaro, J., Esposito, N., Saunderson, C., Macera, M., & Ketchum, T. (2018). Disruption within Alternative Lending Global Financial Markets and Institutions Group 6.

8. Cumming, D. J., & Hornuf, L. (2017). Marketplace Lending of SMEs. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894574

9. Dorfleitner, G., Priberny, C., Schuster, S., Stoiber, J., Weber, M., de Castro, I., & Kammler, J. (2016). Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending - Evidence from two leading European platforms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 64,

10. Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455–2483. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs071

11. Feng, Y., Fan, X., & Yoon, Y. (2015). Lenders and Borrowers’ Strategies in Online Peer-To-Peer Lending Market: an Empirical Analysis of Ppdai.Com. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(3), 242–260. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.as

12. Han, J. T., Chen, Q., Liu, J. G., Luo, X. L., & Fan, W. (2018). The persuasion of borrowers’ voluntary information in peer to peer lending: An empirical study based on elaboration likelihood model. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 200–214. https://doi.org

13. Herzenstein, M., Dholakia, U. M., & Andrews, R. L. (2011). Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.07.001

14. Hobbs, J., Grigore, G., Molesworth, M., & Hobbs, J. (2016). Success in the management of crowdfunding projects in the creative industries. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-08-2014-0202

15. Iyer Asim Ijaz Khwaja Erzo P Luttmer Kelly Shue, R. F. (2009). Screening in New Credit Markets Can Individual Lenders Infer Borrower Creditworthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending? AFA Denver Meetings, (August), 42. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1570115

16. Jesson, Jill, Lydia Matheson, and F. M. L. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE.

17. Lin, M., Prabhala, N., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560

18. Lin, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2016). Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market. Management Science, 62(5), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2219546

19. Liu, D., Brass, D., Lu, Y., & Chen, D. (2013). Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 729–724.

20. Liu, P., & Zhang, J. (2012). Rational Herding in Microloan Markets. Management Science, 58(5), 892–912. https://doi.org/doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459

21. Luo, B., & Lin, Z. (2013). A decision tree model for herd behavior and empirical evidence from the online P2P lending market. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 11(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-011-0182-4

22. Malekipirbazari, M., & Aksakalli, V. (2015). Risk assessment in social lending via random forests. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(10), 4621–4631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.001

23. Michels, J. (2012). Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1387–1415.

24. Mollick, E., & Robb, A. (2016). Democratizing Innovation and Capital Access: The Role of Crowdfunding. California Management Review, 58(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.2.72

25. Pope, D. G., & Sydnor, J. R. (2011). What ’ s in a Picture ? Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper . com. The Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 53–92. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.1.53

26. Ramcharan, R., & Crowe, C. (2013). The impact of house prices on consumer credit: Evidence from an internet bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(6), 1085–1115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12045

27. Sonenshein, S., Herzenstein, M., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011). How accounts shape lending decisions through fostering perceived trustworthiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.009

28. Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012. 05.003

29. Zhang, B., Wardrop, R., Ziegler, T., Burton, J., Garvey, K., Lui, A., & James, A. (2016). SUSTAINING MOMENTUM In Partnership with. The 2nd European Alternative Finance in Industry Report, (September).