|Title:||Market Communication: Ethical and Praxeological Dimensions|
Vol. 11, No 2, 2018
Published date: 06-2018 (print) / 06-2018 (online)
Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal
|Keywords:||communication, praxeology, ethics, marketing, advertising, public relations, social marketing, philanthropy, product placement, corporate social responsibility|
|JEL classification:||B59, D21, D64, D83, D90, L10, M30, M14|
Communication is one of the main organizational processes and at the same time one of the four basic marketing variables. Apart from some specific aspects of interpersonal communication, in this paper, we focus on the key issues of communication with the market and its stakeholders, because it determines the sales of products and services in a competitive environment, and consequently affects the income and profit of the company. The main aspect of communication with the market is its effectiveness (including the issues of ineffectiveness and/or counter-effective action) and the relationship of expenditures and revenues (efficiency, etc.), i.e. the praxeological dimension. From the beginning of marketing, the ethical aspect of communication has also arisen some doubts which are still on the table. In recent times, the area was dominated by the issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this article, we address numerous issues of communication with the market, but it is far from being exhaustive. The basic method adopted here is a review of the literature in this field.
1. Andreu, L., Casado-Diaz, A. B., & Mattila, A. S. (2015). Effects of message appeal and service type in CSR communication strategies. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1488-1495.
2. Baghi, I., Rubaltelli, E., & Tedeschi, M. (2009). A strategy to communicate corporate social responsibility: cause related marketing and its dark side. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 15-26.
3. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Is philanthropy strategic? An analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(3), 234-245.
4. Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (1998). Business ethics. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
5. Cádima, F. R. (2016). O (des)controlo da Internet: bad bots, astroturfing e flogging. Revista Brasileira de História da Mídia, 5(2), 205-216.
6. CECP (2016). Giving in numbers 2016 edition. CECP – Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy, in association with The Conference Board. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://cecp.co/download-pdf-form/?pdflink=wp-content/uploads/2016/11/GIN2016_Finalwe
7. Chaudhri, V. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the communication imperative: perspectives from CSR managers. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 419-442.
8. Cone, C. L. (2012, August 15). Purpose: The Fifth ‘P’. Marketing News, 30.
9. Davtyan, D., & Cunningham, I. (2017). An investigation of brand placement effects on brand attitudes and purchase intentions: Brand placement versus TV commercials. Journal of Business Research, 70, 160-167.
10. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64-87.
11. Delta Cafés (n.d.). Retrieved March 6, 2015, from http://www.delta-cafes.pt/.
12. Devin, B. (2016). Half-truths and dirty secrets: omissions in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42, 226-228.
13. Drumwright, M. E., & Murphy, P. E. (2009). The current state of advertising ethics. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 83-107.
14. Dudley, P. (1995). Editor’s Introduction. In P. Dudley (ed.), Kotarbiński’s Praxiology (pp. xiv-xxix). Hull (UK): Centre for Systems Studies Press.
15. Edelman, D. J. (2006). The golden age of public relations. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(1), 20-21.
16. Eagle, L., & Dahl, S. (2015). Product placement in old and new media: examining the evidence for concern. Journal of Business Ethics, (In Press).
17. Finn, D. (1959). Struggle for Ethics in Public Relations. Harvard Business Review, 37(1), 49-53.
18. Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2015). Organizations, stakeholders, and intermediaries: towards a general theory. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9, 253-271.
19. Freeman, R. E. (2002). The possibility of stakeholder capitalism. In: L. Zsolnai & W. W. Gasparski (eds.), Ethics and the future of capitalism (pp. 111-116). New Brunswick: Transaction Pub.
20. Freire, A. (1998). Estratégia. Sucesso em Portugal. Lisboa: Verbo.
21. Gasparski, W. (1993). Tadeusz Kotarbiński’s Philosophy as a Philosophy of Practicality. In: T. Airaksinesn & W. W. Gasparski (eds.), Practical Philosophy and Action Theory (pp. 93-101). New Brunswick: Transaction Pub.
22. Garbarski, L. (2012). Etyczne aspekty działań marketingowych. In: W. Gasparski (ed.), Biznes, etyka, odpowiedzialność (pp. 64-78). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Profesjonalne PWN.
23. Gautier, A., & Pache, A.-C. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: a review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 343-369.
24. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 315-327.
25. Grzegorczyk, A. (1989). Mała propedeutyka filozofii naukowej. Warszawa: Pax.
26. Guerreiro, J., Rita, P., & Trigueiros, D. (2016). A text mining-based review of cause-related marketing literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 111-128.
27. Hallahan, K. (1994). Public relations and circumvention of the press. Public Relations Quarterly, 39(2), 17-19.
28. Hazaparu, M.-A. (2014). Setting the agenda in advertising: understanding ethical dilemmas from a communicative perspective. Comunicação e Sociedade, 25, 328-342.
29. Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 103-113.
30. Karnaukhova, N. A., & Polyanskaya, E. V. (2016). Communication and reputation as essentials for the positioning of an organization. AI & Society, 31, 371-379.
31. European Commission (2001). Green paper. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0366:FIN:en:PDF.
32. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Sanders, J., & Wong, V. (1996). Principles of Marketing. The European Edition. London – Munich: Prentice Hall.
33. Kotler, P. (1967/94). Marketing Management. Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall International, Inc.
34. Kowalczyk, C. M., & Royne, M. B. (2012). Are products more real on reality shows? An exploratory study of product placement in reality television programming. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 33(2), 248-266.
35. Kuraszko, I. (2012). Etyka w komunikowaniu społecznym przedsiębiorstwa. In: W. Gasparski (ed.), Biznes, etyka, odpowiedzialność (pp. 154-164). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Profesjonalne PWN.
36. Lai, C. J. (2016). The effect of individual market orientation on sales performance: an integrated framework for assessing the role of formal and informal communications. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(3), 328-343.
37. Lindon, D., Lendrevie, J., Lévy, J., Dionísio, P., & Rodrigues, J. V. (1992/2010). Mercator XXI. Teoria e prática do marketing. Alfragide: Publicações Dom Quixote.
38. Lock, I., Seele, P., & Heath, R. L. (2016). Where grass has no roots: the concept of ‘shared strategic communication’ as an answer to unethical astroturf lobbying. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 87-100.
39. Mitchell, T. R. (1982). People in organizations: an introduction to organizational behavior. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
40. Moravcíkova, K., Stefanikova, L., & Rypakova, M. (2015). CSR reporting as an important tool of CSR communication. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 332-338.
41. Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 171-182.
42. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.
43. Ossowska, M. (1970/85). Normy moralne. Próba systematyzacji. Warszawa: PWN.
44. Pichola, I. (2012). Raportowanie i ocena społecznej odpowiedzialności. In: W. Gasparski (ed.), Biznes, etyka, odpowiedzialność. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Profesjonalne PWN.
45. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 57-68.
46. Schauster, E., & Neill, M. (2017). Have the ethics changed? An examination of ethics in advertising and public relations agencies. Journal of Media Ethics, 32(1), 45-60.
47. Smarandescu, L., & Shimp, T. A. (2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26, 715-726.
48. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 434-446.
49. Tam, L. (2015). News about corporate social responsibility (CSR): the interplay of intermedia agenda setting influences between corporate news releases and press coverage. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 117-130.
50. Tata, J., & Prasad, S. (2015). CSR communication: an impression management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 765-778.
51. Uribe, R., & Fuentes-García, A. (2015). The effects of TV unhealthy food brand placement on children. Its separate and joint effect with advertising. Appetite, 91, 165-172.
52. Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: the roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159-1181.