Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Explaining success perception of Polish international new ventures: Four perspectives
Issue: Vol. 11, No 4, 2018
Published date: 12-2018 (print) / 12-2018 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Tomasz Sikora
SGH Warsaw School of Economics

Ewa Baranowska-Prokop
SGH Warsaw School of Economics
Keywords: International New Ventures, Born Globals, Success Perception, Competitive Strategy, Marketing-mix, Performance
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/7
Index PUBMS: 56db6390-18e0-11e9-82eb-fa163e6feac6
Language: English
Pages: 106-127 (22)
JEL classification: L10, M10, L31
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?623,en_explaining-success-perception-of-polish-international-new-ventures-four-perspectives
Licenses:
Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of the following four groups of factors on success perception by managers of Polish small- and medium-sized international new ventures (SMEs INVs): 1) competitive strategy expressed by international orientation of top management and applied marketing-mix tools, 2) competitive strategy analyzed within M.E. Porter’s framework, 3) sector-specific determinants (industrial branches), and 4) main export markets. Two measures of success perception are considered: subjective evaluation of firm’s financial situation and assessment of firm’s success as compared to competitors. The methods of data analyses are correlations and multiple linear regression (SPSS software). The analysis is conducted separately for small-sized companies and for medium-sized firms. The hypotheses concerning the roles of international orientation, marketing-mix tools, industrial branches, and main export markets in explaining success have been fully or partially confirmed. The factors that are most positively related to the perception of success across both groups of firms and two measures of success perceptions are high-quality products, good product development strategy and capability to create unique products, i.e. differentiation strategy. The obtained results imply that the most fundamental factor of success is a good product policy within the framework of a differentiation strategy. The second objective of this paper is to provide a comparison between small and medium-sized enterprises, analyzing whether there is a reason to consider SMEs as a uniform category, or whether the factors explaining success are different depending on firms’ size.

Bibliography

1. Androniceanu, A., & Popescu, C.R. (2017). An inclusive model for an effective development of the renewable energies public sector. Administratie si Management Public, (28), 81- 96.

2. Baranowska-Prokop, E., & Sikora, T. (2014). Relationship between competitive strategies and the success perception of Polish-born globals. International Journal of Management and Economics, 43, 94-113.

3. Baranowska-Prokop, E., & Sikora, T. (2016). Postrzeganie innowacyjności oraz jej związku z sukcesem firmy przez kadrę menedżerską polskich przedsiębiorstw wcześnie umiędzynarodowionych. Marketing iRynek, 8, 25-31.

4. Baranowska-Prokop, E., & Sikora, T. (2017). Innovativeness and success perception of Polish small- and medium-sized international new ventures. Journal of International Studies, 10, 134-146.

5. Choquette, E., Rask, M., Sala, D., & Schröder, Ph. (2017). Born Globals –Is there fire behind the smoke? International Business Review, 26, 448–460.

6. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J. (2018). Process and product innovations, multi-product status and export performance: firm-level evidence from V–4 countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.2

7. Cieślik, J. (2010). Internacjonalizacja polskich przedsiębiorstw. Aktualne tendencje – implikacje dla polityki gospodarczej. Nauka dla Praktyki i Polityki Gospodarczej, 1.

8. Contractor, F. J. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. transaction costs perspective. Management International Review, 47, 453-475.

9. Coviello, N. E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 713-731.

10. Crick, D. (2009). The internationalization of born global and international new venture SMEs. International Marketing Review, 26, 453-476.

11. Danik, L., & Kowalik, I. (2013). The studies on born global companies – a review of research methods. Journal of Economics & Management, 13, 9-26.

12. Danik, L., & Kowalik, I. (2015). Success Factors and Development Barriers Perceived by the Polish Born Global Companies. Empirical Study Results. Journal of East European Management Studies, 20, 360-390.

13. Duliniec, E. (2011). Koncepcje przedsiębiorstw wcześnie umiędzynarodowionych. Rozważania terminologiczne. Gospodarka Narodowa, 1-2, 63-80.

14. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

15. Ehrenberger, M., Koudelkova, P., & Strielkowski, W. (2015). Factors influencing innovation in small and medium enterprises in the Czech Republic. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7737

16. Evangelista, F. (2005). Qualitative insights into the international new venture creation process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3, 179-198.

17. Fletcher, D. (2000). Learning to think global and act locally: experiences from the small business sector. Education+Training, 42, 211-219.

18. Gabrielsson, M., Kirpilani, V. H. M., Dimitratos, P., Solberg, C. A., & Zucchella, A. (2008). Born globals: propositions to help advance the theory. International Business Review, 17, 385–401.

19. Gomes, L., & Ramaswamy, K. (1999). An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 173-188.

20. Gorynia, M. (2007). Strategie zagranicznej ekspansji przedsiębiorstw. Warszawa: PWE.

21. Halldin, T. (2012). Born global firms - do they perform differently? CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No. 269.

22. Idzikowski, W., & Perechuda, I. (2018). Agile approach in a transforming organization, a descriptive study of chosen Polish companies with rapid revenue growth. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.023.

23. Jolly, V.K., Alahuhta, M., & Jeannet, J. (1992). Challenging the incumbents: how high technology start-ups compete globally. Journal of Strategic Change, 1, 71-82.

24. Kamboj, Sh., & Rahman, Z., (2015) Marketing capabilities and firm performance: literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64, 1041-1067.

25. Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The born global firm: a challenge to traditional internationalization theory. In S. T. Cavusgil, T. Madsen (Eds.), Advances in International Marketing, 8, Greenwich, 11-26.

26. Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities and born global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 15–35.

27. Kowalik, I., & Baranowska-Prokop, E. (2013). Determinanty powstawania i motywy ekspansji polskich przedsiębiorstw wcześnie umiędzynarodowionych. GospodarkaNarodowa, 4, 41-64.

28. Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. (1997). The internationalization of born global firms – an evolutionary process. International Business Review, 6, 561-583.

29. Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.

30. McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 469-487.

31. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 902-906.

32. McDougall, P. P., Oviatt, B. M., & Shrader, R. C. (2003). A comparison of international and domestic new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 59-82.

33. Meyer, N., Meyer, D.F., & Molefe, K.N. (2016). Barriers to small informal business development and entrepreneurship: The case of the Emfuleni region Polish Journal of Management Studies, 13 (1), 121-133.

34. Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, Ch. H., (2009). Market Orientation, Marketing Capabilities, and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (8). 909-920.

35. Nowakowski, M. (1999). Wprowadzenie do zarządzania międzynarodowego. Warszawa: Difin.

36. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1). 45-64.

37. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall P. (1995). Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage, The Academy of Management Executive, 9, (2), 30-43

38. Pietrasieński, P., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2015). Internationalization of small and medium enterprises – Empirical research review on barriers to entry into foreign markets. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 11 (1), 113-123.

39. Porter, M. E. (1992). Strategia konkurencji. Metody analizy sektorów i konkurentów. Warszawa: PWE.

40. Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors (with a new introduction). The Free Press.

41. Przybylska, K. (2010). Born Global – nowa generacja małych polskich przedsiębiorstw. Gospodarka Narodowa, 7-8, 63-83.

42. Przybylska, K. (2013). Born Global - nowa generacja małych przedsiębiorstw. Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie.

43. Rasmussen, E. S., Madsen T. K., & Evangelista, F. (2001). The founding of the born global company in Denmark and Australia: sensemaking and networking. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 13, 75-107.

44. Rennie, M. W. (1993). Global competitiveness: born global. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45-52.

45. Ruigrok, W., & Wagner, H. (2003). Internationalization and performance: an organizational learning perspective. Management International Review, 43, 63-83.

46. Simionescu, M., & Strielkowski, W. (2017). Brand loyalty and fashion marketing: A case study of Romanian youth. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 25-31. doi:10.21272/mmi.2017.1-02

47. Servais, P., & Rasmussen, E. S. (2000). Different types of international new ventures, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International Business, Phoenix.

48. Spence, M. (2003). International strategy formation in small Canadian high-technology companies – A case study approach. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1, 277-296.

49. Sullivan, D. (1994). measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 325-342.

50. Thomas, D. E., & Eden, L. (2004). What is the shape of the multinationality-performance relationship? The Multinational Business Review, 12, 89-110.