Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: GDP, Time Allocation and Annual Time Worked Per Adult in Central and Eastern European Countries
Issue: Vol. 10, No 1, 2017
Published date: 03-2017 (print) / 03-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Jacek Jankiewicz
Poznan University of Economics and Business
Keywords: CEE countries, time-use, total market work, HETUS, economic welfare
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/7
Index PUBMS: 6ac60f98-003f-11e8-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 94-111 (18)
JEL classification: D60, I31
Website: http://www.economics-sociology.eu/?473,en_gdp-time-allocation-and-annual-time-worked-per-adult-in-central-and-eastern-european-countries
Licenses:
Abstract

When decisions taken in the context of monetary price and monetary income are investigated, economists have naturally tended to focus their attention on the market activities of households. Consequently, a significant portion of the economic decisions that are taken in the non-market sphere have remained overlooked. Thus it has been recognised that it is necessary to take into account the production generated by households in the measurement of economic wealth. The aim of this paper is to analyse differences in the economic activity of selected Central and Eastern Europe societies. The use of traditional statistics and time-use data for this purpose made it possible to compare the conclusions that can be drawn using different sources of information. As the statistical material has been supplemented with time-use data, prior conclusions about creating the economic welfare of these societies needed to be modified. The different allocations of time in the individual societies and the different extents to which household production is substituted by market goods and services have an impact on the level of prosperity of households. The significant differences in terms of compensating for market work with household production which were observed when comparing the daily activity of unemployed men and women, turned out to be a common feature of the analysed populations.

Bibliography

1. Aguiar, M, Hurst, E and Karabarbounis, L (2012), Recent Developments in the Economics of Time Use, The Annual Review of Economics 4, pp. 373-397.

2. Alesina, A. F, Glaeser, E. L and Sacerdote, B. (2006), Work and Leisure in the U.S. and Europe: Why So Different? In: Gertler, M., Rogoff, K., (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2005, 20, MIT Press, http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0073 (accessed 8 July 2015

3. Becker, G. S (1965), A Theory of the Allocation of Time, The Economic Journal 75(299), pp. 493-517.

4. Bianchi, S. M, Milkie, M. A, Sayer, L. C. and Robinson, J. P. (2000), Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor, Social Forces 79(1), pp. 191-228.

5. Bridgman, B (2013), Home Productivity, BEA Working Papers 0091, Manuscript, Bureau of Economic Analysis, available at: http://www.bea.gov/papers/pdf/homeproductivity.pdf (accessed 12 July 2015).

6. Burda, M., Hamermesh, D. S. and Weil, P. (2006), Different but Equal Total Work, Gender and Social Norms, Published in 8th European Conference of the Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti, "Are Europeans Lazy? Or Americans Crazy?", May 2006, Portovenere, Italy.

7. Burda, M., Hamermesh, D. S., Weil, P. (2007), Total Work, Gender And Social Norms, Working Paper 13000, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Cambridge, March, http://www.nber.org/papers/w13000 (accessed 27 February 2015).

8. Church, J., Everaers, P., Mcdonald, M., Pietsch, L. and Weinberg, D. (2000), Overview of the Proposed Standards for Income Distribution Statistics, paper prepared for the 26th General Conference of The International Association for Research in Income and

9. Cushman, G., Veal, A. J. and Zuzanek, J. (2005), Leisure participation and time-use surveys: an overview, In: Cushman, G., Veal, A. J. and Zuzanek, J. (eds.), Free Time and Leisure Participation: International Perspectives, Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishin

10. Eisner, R. (1988), Extended Accounts for National Income and Product, Journal of Economic Literature 26(4), pp. 1611-1684.

11. Eurostat (2004), How Europeans spend their time Everyday life of women and men, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-pocketbooks/-/KS-58-04-998 (accessed 12 Ju

12. Eurostat (2009), Harmonised European time use surveys. 2008 guidelines, Methodologies and working papers, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/KS-RA-08

13. Fahey, T., Layte, R., Smith, E., Whelan, C. and Fisher, K. (2003), Quality of life in Europe: an illustrative report, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

14. Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R. and Timmer, M. P. (2013), The Next Generation of the Penn World Table, available at: www.ggdc.net/pwt (accessed 27 February 2015).

15. Ferber, M. A. and Birnbaum, B. G. (1980), Housework: Priceless or Valueless? Review of Income and Wealth 26(4), pp. 387-400.

16. Fisher, K. and Tucker, J., contributions from: Altintas, E., Bennett, M., Jahandar, A., Jun. J. and other members of the Time Use Team (2013), Technical Details of Time Use Studies, Last updated 15 July 2013, Oxford: Centre for Time Use Research, Universi

17. Fisher, K., Gershuny, J., Gauthier, A. and Victorino, C. (2000), Exploring New Ground for Using the Multinational Time-Use Study, Working Paper, ESRC research Centre on Micro-Social Change, Colchester: University of Essex.

18. Freeman, R. B. and Schettkat, R. (2005), Marketization of Household Production and the EU-US Gap in Work, Economic Policy 20(41), pp. 7-50.

19. Gershuny, J. and Robinson, J. P. (1988), Historical Shifts in the Household Division of Labor, Demography 25(4), pp. 537-552.

20. Gimenez-Nadal, J. .I and Sevilla, A. (2014), Total work time in Spain: evidence from time diary data, Applied Economics 46(16), pp. 1894-1909.

21. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1982), Unpaid Work in the Household. a Review of Economic Methods, Women, Work and Development Series, No. 1, Geneva: International Labour Office.

22. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1993), Monetary valuation of non-market productive time-Methodological considerations, Review of lncome and Wealth 39(4), pp. 419-433.

23. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. and Pagnossin-Aligisakis, E. (1999), Households’ non-SNA production: labour time, value of labour and of product, and contribution to extended private consumption, Review of Income and Wealth 45, pp. 519-529.

24. Graham, J. W. and Green, C. A. (1984), Estimating the Parameters of a Household Production Function with Joint Products, The Review of Economics and Statistics 66(2), pp. 277-282.

25. Gronau, R (1973a), The Intrafamily Allocation of Time: The Value of the Housewives' Time, The American Economic Review 63(4), pp. 634-651.

26. Gronau, R. (1977), Leisure, Home Production, and Work-the Theory of the Allocation of Time Revisited, The Journal of Political Economy 85(6), pp. 1099-1123.

27. Gronau, R (1980), Home Production-A Forgotten Industry, The Review of Economics and Statistics LXII(3), pp. 408-416.

28. Gronau, R (1986), Home Production – A Survey, In: O. Ashenfelter, R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 273-304.

29. Gronau, R. and Hamermesh, D. S. (2003), Time Vs. Goods: The Value of Measuring Household Production Technologies, NBER Working Paper No. 9650, available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w9650.pdf (accessed 5 May 2015).

30. Hawrylyshyn, O. (1977), Towards a Definition of Non-Market Activities, The Review of Income and Wealth l, pp. 79-96.

31. HETUS (2007), Gneral Description, available at: https://www.h5.scb.se/tus/tus/doc/ General%20description.doc (accessed 23 May 2015).

32. HETUS (online database version 2.0), Created 2005-2007 by Statistics Finland and Statistics Sweden (reference date 2007-10-01), available at: http://www.tus.scb.se (accessed 28 May 2015).

33. HETUS metadata, available at: https://www.h2.scb.se/tus/tus/doc/Metadata.pdf (accessed 21 August 2015).

34. Hill, T. P. (1979), Do-It-Yourself and GDP, Review of Income and Wealth 25(1), pp. 31-39.

35. Jankiewicz, J. (2015), Time allocation in Poland before and after 1989 – working time perspective, Time & Society, 0961463X15587836, first published on May 27.

36. Kooreman, P. and Kapteyn, A. (1987), A Disaggregated Analysis of the Allocation of Time within the Household, Journal of Political Economy 95(2), pp. 223-224.

37. Kuznets, S. (1934), National Income 1929-1932. Letter From The Acting Secretary Of Commerce Transmitting In Response To Senate Resolution No. 220 (72d Cong.), A Report On National Income, 1929-32, Washington: United States Government Printing Office.

38. Lancaster, K. J. (1966a), A new approach to consumer theory, The Journal of Political Economy 74(2), pp. 132-157.

39. Lancaster, K. J. (1966b), Change and innovation in the technology of consumption, American Economic Review 56(1), pp. 14-23.

40. Landefeld, J. S. and Mcculla, S. H. (2000), Accounting For Nonmarket Household Production Within A National Accounts Framework, Review of Income and Wealth 46(3), pp. 289-307.

41. Lee, D. and Wolpin, K. (2010), Accounting for Wage and Employment Changes in the U.S. from 1968-2000: A Dynamic Model of Labor Market Equilibrium, Journal of Econometrics 156(1), pp. 68-85.

42. Łobodzińska, B. (1995), Family, Women, and Employment in Central-Eastern Europe, Contributions in Sociology, Westport, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press.

43. Lützel, H. (1989), Household production and national accounts, Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE 6(4), pp. 337-348.

44. Michael, R. T. and Becker, G. S. (1973), On the New Theory of Consumer Behavior, The Swedish Journal of Economics 75(4), pp. 378-396.

45. Muth, R. F. (1966), Household production and consumer demand functions, Econometrica 34, pp. 699-708.

46. Ngai, L. R. and Petrongolo, B. (2014), Gender gaps and the rise of the service economy. CFM discussion paper series, CFM-DP2014-4, Centre For Macroeconomics, London, UK, available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/58152/ (accessed 21 August 2015).

47. OECD, "Main Economic Indicators – complete database", Main Economic Indicators (database), available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00052-en (accessed 11 August 2015).

48. Österberg, C. and Baigorri, A. (1999), Eurostat project on harmonisation of Time Use surveys, Eurostat, Luxembourg, available at: http://www.stat.fi/isi99/proceedings/arkisto/varasto/baig0109.pdf (accessed 21 August 2015).

49. Quah, E. (1986), Persistent Problems in Measuring Household Production: Definition, Quantifying Joint Activities and Valuation Issues Are Solvable, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 45(2), pp. 235-245.

50. Reid, M. G. (1934), Economics of Household Production, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., London: Chapman & Hall, Limited.

51. Szulc, A. (2007), Dochód i konsumpcja (Income and consumption), In: Panek, T. (eds.), Statystyka społeczna (Social Statistics), Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa, pp. 131-163.

52. System of national accounts (1993), Commission of the European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, and World Bank, OECD, Paris.

53. United Nations (2013), Guidelines for Harmonizing Time-Use Surveys, United Nations Economic Commission For Europe, Geneva, available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2013/TimeUseSurvey_Guidelines.pdf (accessed 12 July 2015).