Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Determining factors in becoming a sustainable smart city: An empirical study in Europe
Issue: Vol. 13, No 1, 2020
Published date: 03-2020 (print) / 03-2020 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: María Teresa Nevado Gil
University of Extremadura, Facultad de Empresas, Finanzas y Turismo, Cáceres, Spain

Luísa Carvalho
Institute Polytechnic of Setúbal, School of Business and Administration, Setúbal & CEFAGE-University of Évora, Portugal

Inna Paiva
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal
Keywords: smart cities, Europe, sustainability, factors
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/2
Index PUBMS: 6b74b80d-78be-11ea-a0f3-fa163e0fa1a0
Language: English
Pages: 24-39 (16)
JEL classification: H70, O10, Q56
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?723,en_determining-factors-in-becoming-a-sustainable-smart-city-an-empirical-study-in-europe
Licenses:
This work was supported by Institute Polytechnic of Setúbal (School of Business and Administration) and Foundation for Science and Technology, grants: UIDB / 00315/2020 and UIDB/04007/2020.
Abstract

This paper aims firstly to identify differences and similarities between cities according to the activities which are necessary to become a smart city and secondly to identify relevant factors that could influence positions in the smart cities ranking. To achieve these goals, this study uses a quantitative analysis applied to 73 European cities to identify the factors that influence differences between smart cities. The results suggest the formation of clusters around European smart cities and also that cities located geographically in the west of Europe and with governance by women present higher levels in the European Smart Cities rankings.

Bibliography

1. Abdala, L. N., Schreiner, T., da Costa, E. M., & dos Santos, N. (2014). Como as cidades inteligentes contribuem para o desenvolvimento de cidades sustentáveis?: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Mana

2. Albuquerque, C. (2017). Cities really smart and inclusive: Possibilities and limits for social inclusion and participation in Luísa Carvalho (ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurial Development and Innovation within Smart Cities, Pennsylvania, USA:

3. Adams, R.B., & P. Funk (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter?. Management Science, 58, 219-235.

4. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable & smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009.

5. Aguilera, G., Galán, J.L., Campos, J.C., & Rodríguez, P. (2013). An accelerated-time simulation for traffic flow in a smart city. FEMTEC, 26.

6. Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N., & Al-Jarrodi, J. (2015). Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6-25.

7. Alkandari A, Alnasheet, M., & Alshekhly, IFT. (2012) Smart cities: Survey. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 2(2), 79-90.

8. Anderson, W., & Mizak, D. (2006). Politics of environmental law: Political ideology, elitism or urban-rural interests?. Public Choice, 1(29), 131-157.

9. Araujo, J., & Tejedo-Romero, F. (2017). Does gender equality affect municipal transparency: The case of Spain. Public Performance & Management Review, 1-31.

10. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E. & Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 135-148.

11. Bavetta, S., & Padovano, F. (2000). A model of the representation of interest in a compound democracy. Constit. Polit. Econ., 11(1), 5-25.

12. Beck, S. A. (2001). Acting as women: The effects and limitations of gender in local governance. In S. J. Carroll (Ed.), The impact of women in public office. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (49-67). Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/234

13. Bernardo, M. R. (2017). Smart city governance: from e-government to smart governance. In Luísa Carvalho (ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurial Development and Innovation within Smart Cities, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global, 300-336 (ISBN-13: 978-152

14. Berrone, & Ricart. (2017). IESE Cities in Motion, Business School, University of Navarra. Available at: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0396-E.pdf

15. Brkljačić, T., Majetić, F., & Tarabić, B. (2017) Smart Environment: Cyber Parks. In Luísa Carvalho (ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurial Development and Innovation within Smart Cities, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global, 160-181 (ISBN-13: 978-1522

16. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.

17. Carvalho, L. (2017). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Lisbon as a Smart Start-up City. In Luísa Carvalho (ed.), Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurial Development and Innovation within Smart Cities, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global, 1-24 (ISBN-13: 978-1522519782

18. Cohen, B. (2017). Retrieved from http: //www.boydcohen.com/smartcities.html (accessed 20.2.2017)

19. Dierwechter, Y. (2017). Urban Sustainability through Smart Growth: Intercurrence, Planning, and Geographies of Regional Development across Greater Seattle. Cham: Springer.

20. Dierwechter, Y., Herrschel, T., & Lintz, G. (2017). Smart city-regional governance for sustainability? Reflections Issue 20, University of Westminster, Regional Studies Research Network on Smart City-Regional Governance for Sustainability.

21. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051-1079. doi:10.1257/jel.50.4.1051.

22. European Union. (2014). Smart cities and sustainable development. Available at: https://eu-smartcities.eu/sites/all/files/blog/files/EIB%20%26%20EIP%20Smart%20Cities%20Financing_0.pdf

23. European Parliament. (2014). Mapping Smart Cities in the EU. Directorate General for Internal Policies. Policy Department. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2014/507480/IPOL-ITRE_ET(2014)507480_EN.pdf

24. Fox, R. L., & Schuhmann, R. A. (1999). Gender and local government: A comparison of women and men city managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 231–242.

25. García-Sánchez, I.M., & Prado-Lorenzo, J.M. (2008). Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union. Sustainability Development, 16, 17 - 34.

26. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, M., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: ranking of European medium-sized cities. Available at: http://smartcity-ranking.org/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf

27. Hall, R.E. (2000). The vision of a smart city. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, France, 28 September.

28. Herrschel, T., & Dierwechter, Y. (2015). Smart city-regional governance: a dual transition. Regions, 300 (4), 20-21.

29. Hollands, R.G. (2008). Will the real Smart City please stand up?. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy and Action, 13(3), 303–320.

30. Hudalah, D., Zulfahmi, F., & Firman, T. (2013). Regional governance in decentralizing indonesia: learning from the success of urban-rural cooperation in metropolitan Yogyakarta. In T. Bunnell, D. Parthasarathy, y E. C. Thompson (Eds.), Cleavage, Connectio

31. Karyy, O., & Knjazevska, O. (2009). Tasks prioritization of strategic planning of cities development: experts’ approach. Economics & Sociology, 2(1), 58-66.

32. Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems, and digital spaces. London: Routledge, 2002.

33. Lee, J.H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S.-H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80(2), 286–306.

34. Lazaroiu, G., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy, 47 (1), 326-332.

35. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25(2), 137–149.

36. Lucas, M.R., Rego, C., Vieira, C., & Vieira, I. (2017). Proximity an cooperation for innovative regional development: The case of science and technology park. In Luísa Carvalho (ed.), Handbook of Research On Entrepreneurial Development and Innovation with

37. Mar, M. C. & Serrano, C. (2001). Bank failure: a multidimensional scaling approach. European Journal of Finance, 7(2), 165-183.

38. Mckinsey Global Institute. (2011). Urban world: mapping the economic power of cities. MGI.

39. Mosher, F. (1982). Democracy and the public service (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford. University Press.

40. Mueller, D.C. (1979). Public Choice. University Press, Cambridge.

41. Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public Choice II. University Press, Cambridge.

42. Nam, T., & T.A. Pardo, T.A. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions, Proc. 12th Conference on Digital Government Research, College Park, MD, June 12– 15.

43. Navarro, G. A., Alcaraz, F. J., & Ortiz, D. (2010). La divulgación de información sobre responsabilidad corporativa en administraciones públicas: un estudio empírico en gobiernos locales. Revista Española de Contabilidad, RC-SAC, 13(2), 285-314.

44. Nevado-Gil, M. T. & Gallardo-Vázquez, D. (2016). Información sobre Responsabilidad Social contenida en las páginas webs de los ayuntamientos. Estudio en la región del Alentejo. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 39(4), 150.

45. ONU (2012). Resilient people, resilient planet: a future worth choosing. Report of the United Nations secretary general’s high-level panel on global sustainability.

46. Pardo Merino, A., & Ruiz Diaz, M. A. (2005). Análisis de Datos con SSPS 13 Base. Aravaca: MCGraw-Hill.

47. Pérez, C. (2001). Técnicas estadísticas con SSPS. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.

48. Prado-Lorenzo, J., García-Sanchez, I., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2011). Sustainable cities: do political factors determine the quality of life?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 21, 34-44.

49. Sánchez Carrión, J. J. (1989). Análisis de tablas de contingencia. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 105, 171.

50. Smith, D., & Fridkin, D. (2008). Delegating direct democracy: interparty legislative competition and the adoption of the initiative in the American States. The American Political Science Review, 102(3), 333-350.

51. Steurer, R., & Hametrer, M. (2010). Objectives and indicators in sustainable development strategies: similarities and variances across Europe. Sustainability Development. doi:10.1002/sd.501.

52. Strielkowski, W. (2017), Social and economic implications for the smart grids of the future. Economics and Sociology, 10(1), 310-318.

53. Thite, M. (2011). Smart cities: implications of urban planning for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 14(5), 623-631.

54. Tranos, E., & Gertner, D. (2012). Smart networked cities?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 175–190.

55. UNEP (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. UNEP.

56. Vilá, B.R., Hurtado, M. J. R., Berlanga, V. V., & Fonseca, M. T. (2014). Com aplicar un clúster jeràrquic en SPSS. REIRE. Revista d'Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 7(1), 113-127.

57. Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135.

58. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L.E. (2010). Helping CIOs Understand “Smart City” Initiatives: Defining the Smart City, Its Drivers, and the Role of the CIO (Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research).

59. Winters, J.V. (2011). Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51(2), 253-270.