Economics & Sociology

This study aims to examine the welfare state of Georgia according to the Esping-Andersen’s typology and to justify the theory of “(in)stable welfare states”. This article analyses different aspects of wellbeing (pension and healthcare systems, labour-market policy and family benefits) in Georgia during the period of 1991-2013. The research shows the diversity of policies in different fields of social care. The results revealed that Georgian health and labour-market policies can be classified as liberal ones, while the pension system – as a social-democratic one, and finally the family benefits policy – as a conservative one. Thus, the theory of (in)stable welfare state can be justified in this case and Georgian state overall can be qualified as a country with a hybrid and instable social policy. However, further research is needed for the final confirmation (or rejection) of this theory, once the current policy reforms, started back in 2013, would be fully implemented.

1. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137-158.

2. Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: a two dimensional approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351-372.

3. Burlacu, I. (2007). Welfare state regimes in transition countries: Romania and Moldova compare. Central European University Political Science Journal, 2(3), 302-318.

4. Clayton, R., & Pontusson, J. (1998). Welfare-state retrenchment revisited: entitlement cuts, public sector restructuring, and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist societies. World Politics, 51(1), 67-98.

5. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

6. Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy. In: G. Esping-Andersen (Ed.), Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.

7. Fenger, HJM. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 1-30.

8. Ferrera, M. (1996). The “Southern” model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17-37.

9. Fosse, E. (2011). Different welfare states-different policies? An analysis of the substance of national health promotion policies in three european countries. International Journal of Health Services, 41(2), 255-272.

10. Hague, R., & Harrop, M. (2007). Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

11. Kam, YW. (2012). The contributions of the health decommodification typologies to the study of the East Asian welfare regime. Social Policy and Administration, 46, 108-128.

12. London school of Economics (2012). What is social policy? Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/socialPolicy/aboutUs/introduction.aspx

13. Shvelidze, Z. (2012). Transition from Soviet to Liberal Labour Law: Labour Standards in Georgia. Retrieved from http://ilera2012.wharton.upenn.edu/RefereedPapers/ShvelidzeZakaria%20ILERA%20updated.pdf

14. Social Service Agency (2013). Statistics. Retrieved from http://ssa.gov.ge/index.php?sec_id=610&lang_id=ENG, 10/01/ 2017

15. Stathopoulos, P. (1996). Greece: what future the welfare state? In: V. George & P. Taylor-Gooby (Eds.), European Welfare Policy; Squaring the Welfare Circle (pp. 136-154). New York: St. Martin's.

16. UNICEF Georgia & University of York (2012). The Well-being of Children and Their Families in Georgia. Georgia Welfare Monitoring Survey, Second stage 2011. Retrieved from http://unicef.ge/uploads/WMSFinal_final_Copy_for_web_1_USAID.pdf

17. Welfare state (2015). In Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/welfare-state

18. Wilensky, H. L. (1974). The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.