Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Evaluation of Technological, Economic and Social Indicators for Different Farming Practices in Lithuania
Issue: Vol. 10, No 4, 2017
Published date: 12-2017 (print) / 12-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Aistė Galnaitytė
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics

Irena Kriščiukaitienė
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics

Tomas Baležentis
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics

Virginia Namiotko
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics
Keywords: integrated farming practices, Lithuania, multi-criteria analysis, organic farming practices
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/15
Index PUBMS: 92634c25-f90d-11e7-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 189-202 (14)
JEL classification: C44, Q15, Q18
Website: http://www.economics-sociology.eu/?549,en_evaluation-of-technological-economic-and-social-indicators-for-different-farming-practices-in-lithuania
Licenses:
Abstract

Organic and integrated farming practices contribute to protecting biodiversity, reducing environmental pollution, improving soil quality, and providing high-quality raw material for food industry. The objective of the article is to establish the methodology and evaluate the system of indicators, which enables answering the question which farming practice has more advantages: organic or integrated? Multi-criteria analysis methods were used to achieve this objective. When being compared with between conventional and integrated farming practices, organic farming practice achieves higher profitability and greater energy efficiency. Organic farming reveals to be either superior, or similar to integrated farming practices in environmental terms. Potatoes, fruits and berries under both conventional and integrated farming practices have obtained the same rank (1–2) according to the selected criterions (yield, share of sold product, expenses on plant protection, production cost, price and labour input). Organic farming practice has shown worse rank. Organic farming practice has appeared to be the most suitable for vegetables.

Bibliography

1. Acs, S., Hanley, N., Dallimer, M., Gaston, K. J., Robertson, P., Wilson, P., and Armsworth, P. R. (2010). The effect of decoupling on marginal agricultural systems: Implications for farm incomes, land use and upland ecology. Land use Policy, 27(2), 550-56

2. Balana, B. B., Vinten, A., and Slee, B. (2011). A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: Key issues, methods, and applications. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1021-1031.

3. Balas, M. M. (2014). Seven passive greenhouse synergies. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(4), 199-210.

4. Baležentis, T., Štreimikienė, D., Melnikienė, R., & Yu, Z. (2017). Non-parametric analysis of yield risk in Lithuanian crop farming. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(3), 521-536.

5. Balezentis, T. (2014). On measures of the agricultural efficiency – a review. Transformation in Business & Economics, 13(3).

6. Baležentis, T. (2016). Stochastic production frontier for the Lithuanian family farms. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(2), 283-298.

7. Blanco Fonseca, M. (2007). Advanced modeling tools for integrated assessment of water and agricultural policies. Water and Sustainability Development in the Mediterranean. 3rd Regional Workshop on Water and Sustainable Development in the Mediterranean, Za

8. Craheix, D., Angevin, F., Doré, T., and De Tourdonnet, S. (2016). Using a multicriteria assessment model to evaluate the sustainability of conservation agriculture at the cropping system level in France. European Journal of Agronomy, 76, 75-86.

9. Crowder, D. W., and Reganold, J. P. (2015). Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(24), 7611-7616.

10. Czyżewski, A., & Smędzik-Ambroży, K. (2015). Specialization and diversification of agricultural production in the light of sustainable development. Journal of International Studies, 8(2), 63-73

11. De Luca, A. I., Iofrida, N., Leskinen, P., Stillitano, T., Falcone, G., Strano, A., and Gulisano, G. (2017). Life cycle tools combined with multi-criteria and participatory methods for agricultural sustainability: insights from a systematic and critical r

12. Delmotte, S., Barbier, J. M., Mouret, J. C., Le Page, C., Wery, J., Chauvelon, P., Sandoz, A., and Ridaura, S. L. (2016). Participatory integrated assessment of scenarios for organic farming at different scales in Camargue, France. Agricultural Systems, 1

13. Dzikowski, P. (2013). The impact of information sources for innovation on stimulating innovation activity of food and beverage manufacturers in Western Poland. In: Business development opportunities (ed.), Kardas J. S., Brodowska-Szewczuk J., University o

14. EU Regulation No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 On support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.

15. Eurostat database (2017). Retrieved June 19, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.

16. Giupponi, C., Azzellino, A., Salvetti, R., Parati, P., Carpani, M. (2012). Water quality assessment in the Venice lagoon watershed with multiple modelling approaches. Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Pathways and Visions Under Uncertainty.Internati

17. Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications a State of the Art Survey. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

18. Informacija apie 2016 metais Lietuvoje deklaruotas žemės ūkio naudmenas ir kitus plotus (2016). Vilnius: Valstybės įmonė Žemės ūkio informacijos ir kaimo verslo centras.

19. Jouzi, Z., Azadi, H., Taheri, F., Zarafshani, K., Gebrehiwot, K., Van Passel, S., and Lebailly, P. (2017). Organic Farming and Small-Scale Farmers: Main Opportunities and Challenges. Ecological Economics, 132, 144-154.

20. Kamali, F. P., Borges, J. A., Meuwissen, M. P., de Boer, I. J., and Lansink, A. G. O. (2017). Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems: The validity of expert opinion and robustness of a multi-criteria analysis. Agricultural Systems, 157, 118-128

21. Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L. (2008). Organic crop production: Ambitions and limitations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

22. Kirchmann, H., Kätterer, T., Bergström, L., Börjesson, G., and Bolinder, M. A. (2016). Flaws and criteria for design and evaluation of comparative organic and conventional cropping systems. Field Crops Research, 186, 99-106.

23. Kriščiukaitienė, I., Juškevičienė, D., Galnaitytė, A., Eirošius, Š., Kuliešis, G., and Namiotko, V. (2013). 2014–2020 m. Kaimo plėtros priemonių išmokų dydžių modeliavimas. Studija. Vilnius: LAEI.

24. Kriščiukaitienė, I., Namiotko, V., and Koç, A. A. (2015). The assessment of agricultural sector in Turkey and selected EU countries. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 37(1), 95-102.

25. Lietuvos žemės ūkis 2015 (2016). Vilnius: Lietuvos statistikos departamentas.

26. Manos, B. (2016). A Decision Support System for Multiple Criteria Alternative Ranking Using TOPSIS and VIKOR: A Case Study on Social Sustainability in Agriculture. In: Decision Support Systems VI-Addressing Sustainability and Societal Challenges: 2nd Inte

27. Nemecek, T., Dubois, D., Huguenin-Elie, O., and Gaillard, G. (2011). Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming. Agricultural Systems, 104(3), 217-232.

28. Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(20), 445-455.

29. Pacini, C., Wossink, A., Giesen, G., Vazzana, C., and Huirne, R. (2003). Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: a farm and field-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(1), 273-288.

30. Peigné, J., Casagrande, M., Payet, V., David, C., Sans, F. X., Blanco-Moreno, J. M., Cooper, J., Gascoyne, K., Antichi, D., Bàrberi, P., Bigongiali, F., Surböck, A., Kranzler, A., Beeckman, A., Willekens, K., Luik, A., Matt, D., Grosse, M., Heß, J., Clerc

31. Petit, C., and Aubry, C. (2016). Typology of organic management styles in a cash-crop region using a multi-criteria method. Organic Agriculture, 6(3), 155-169.

32. Posner, J. L., Baldock, J. O., Hedtcke, J. L. (2008). Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: I. Productivity 1990–2002. Agronomy Journal, 100(2), 253-260.

33. Rajnoha, R., and Lesníková, P. (2016). Strategic Performance Management System and Corporate Sustainability Concept-Specific Parametres in Slovak Enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 107-124.

34. Reganold, J. P., Glover, J. D., Andrews, P. K., and Hinman, H. R. (2001). Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature, 410(6831), 926-930.

35. Reiff, M., Surmanová, K., Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Multiple criteria analysis of European Union agriculture. Journal of International Studies, 9(3), 62-74.

36. Rozman, Č., Grgić, Z., Maksimović, A., Ćejvanović, F., Puška, A., and Šakić Bobić, B. (2016). Multiple-criteria approach of evaluation of milk farm models in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mljekarstvo, 66(3), 206-214.

37. Rural Development Programme for Lithuania 2014-2020 (version 3.1). (2017). Approved by the European Commission on the 13th February 2015 by the Decision No C(2015)842 (Last modified by the European Commission on the 14th February 2017 by the Decision No C

38. Sauer, J., Walsh, J., Zilberman, D. (2012). Producer behaviour and agri-environmental policies: A directional distance based matching approach. 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington (124877). Agricultural and Applied Economics Assoc

39. Smith, L. G., Williams, A. G., and Pearce, B. D. (2015). The energy efficiency of organic agriculture: A review. Renewable agriculture and Food systems, 30(3), 280-301.

40. Streimikiene, D., & Bilan, Y. (2015). Review of rural tourism development theories. Transformations in Business & Economics, 14(2), 21-34.

41. Tasca, A. L., Nessi, S., and Rigamonti, L. (2017). Environmental sustainability of agri-food supply chains: An LCA comparison between two alternative forms of production and distribution of endive in northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 725

42. Udagawa, C., Hodge, I., Reader, M. (2014). Farm level costs of Agri‐environment measures: The impact of entry level stewardship on cereal farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 212-233.

43. Ustinovičius, L. (2004). Determination of Efficiency of Investments in Construction. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 8(1), 25-44.

44. Uthes, S., Piorr, A., Zander, P., Bieńkowski, J., Ungaro, F., Dalgaard, T., Stolze, M., Moschitz, H., Schader, C., Happe, K., Sahrbacher, A., Damgaard, M., Toussaint, V., Sattler, C., Reinhardt, F.-J., Kjeldsen, C., Casini, L., Müller, K. (2011). Regional

45. Vico, G., Prodanovic, R., and Bodiroga, R. (2017). A Two-Stage Approach for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making In Plant Production. Proceedings: Savetovanje o Biotehnologiji sa međunarodnim učešćem, Čačak.

46. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Vilutiene, T. (2009). Multicriteria evaluation of apartments blocks maintenance contractors: Lithuanian case study. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(4), 319-338.

47. Žvirblis, A., Buračas, A. (2010). The consolidated measurement of the financial markets development: the case of transitional economies. Technological and economic development of economy: Baltic journal on sustainability, 16(2), 266-279.