Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Partners in a caring society – a nonprofit organization case study
Issue: Vol. 12, No 2, 2019
Published date: 06-2019 (print) / 06-2019 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Amélia O. Carvalho
Porto Polytechnic Institute – ESTG-IPP

Marisa R. Ferreira
Porto Polytechnic Institute – ESTG-IPP

Patrícia Silva
Porto Polytechnic Institute – ESTG-IPP
Keywords: accountability, nonprofit organizations, stakeholders, re-food
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-2/8
Index PUBMS: b1232701-ad48-11e9-bbfd-fa163e0fa1a0
Language: English
Pages: 129-146 (18)
JEL classification: M10
Website: https://www.economics-sociology.eu/?668,en_partners-in-a-caring-society-%E2%80%93-a-nonprofit-organization-case-study
Licenses:
Abstract

In the economic activity of contemporary societies, there is a progressive increase in the importance of nonprofit organizations (NPOs) consequently leading to a growing demand for financial and non-financial information. Considering the mission, values and particular characteristics of NPOs, the accountability reflects a reliable image of their performance for stakeholders. Therefore, NPOs should increasingly give prominence to their accountability. Considering NPOs as mission-based organizations with multiple stakeholders, we believe that the accountability process should be seen specifically as a way of improving the connection between the process and the needs of different stakeholders. This research intends to perceive accountability, in the third-sector growing context, whether information disclosed improved how they account for their actions to stakeholders and constrained their self-interested behavior. Using a case study of an important Portuguese NPO we intend to give an integrated look on the accountability process, considering the main aspects such as transparency and social responsibility, through such indicators as economic sustainability and social value creation.

Bibliography

1. Abdi, A. A., & Shultz, L. (2013). Citizenship and Youth Social Engagement in Canada : Learning Challenges and Possibilities. Journal of Education, 1(2), 54–74.

2. AccoutAbility. (2011). AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard (2011). In AccountAbility. London, UK.

3. Andrade, A. M., & Franco, R. C. (2007). Economia do Conhecimento e Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos (S. P. I. – S. P. de Inovação, Ed.). Porto: Princípia Editora.

4. Balser, D., & McClusky, J. (2005). Managing stakeholder relationships and nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70

5. Bargerstock, A. S. (2000). The HRM Effectiveness Audit: a Tool for Managing Accountability in HRM. Public Personnel Management, 29(4), 517–526.

6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

7. Baruch, Y., & Ramalho, N. (2006). Communalities and Distinctions in the Measurement of Organizational Performance and Effectiveness Across For-Profit and Nonprofit Sectors. Nonprofit And Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/08

8. Behn, B. K., DeVries, D. D., & Lin, J. (2010). The determinants of transparency in nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Advances in Accounting, 26(1), 6–12.

9. Benjamin, L. M., & Campbell, D. C. (2014). Nonprofit Performance : Accounting for the Agency of Clients. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014551987

10. Brown, L. D., & Moore, M. H. (2001). Accountability, Strategy, and International Nongovernmental Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 569–587.

11. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaboration : Propositions from the Literature Abstract. Public Adminstration Review, 66(December), 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.

12. Carman, J. G. (2008). Nonprofits, Funders, and Evaluation: Accountability in Action. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008320190

13. Carvalho. (2005). Organizações Não Lucrativas. Lisboa: Sílabo.

14. Carvalho, A. O., Rodrigues, L. L., & Branco, M. C. (2017). Factors Influencing Voluntary Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Portuguese Foundations. In Voluntas (Vol. 28). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9883-8

15. Chen, H. L., & Hsu, C.-H. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in non-profit service organizations: contingent effect of market orientation. The Service Industries Journal, 33(5), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2011.622372

16. Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2004). Performance Reporting: A Comparative Study of British and Irish Charities. The British Accounting Review, 36, 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2003.10.004

17. Costa, E., Ramus, T., & Andreaus, M. (2011). Accountability as a Managerial Tool in Non-Profit Organizations: Evidence from Italian CSVs. Voluntas, 22(3), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9183-7

18. Demo, P. (1988). Participação é Conquista (Cortez Edi). São Paulo - Brasil.

19. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

20. Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. New York: Harper Collins.

21. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7

22. Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability Myopia : Losing Sight of Organizational Learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004269430

23. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector : Civil Society at Risk ? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.

24. Fallon, B. J., & Rice, S. M. (2011). Investment in staff development within an emergency services organisation: comparing future intention of volunteers and paid employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, (March 2013), 1–16. https:

25. Felício, J. A., Gonçalves, H. M., & Gonçalves, V. da C. (2013). Social value and organizational performance in non-profit social organizations: Social entrepreneurship, leadership, and socioeconomic context effects. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2

26. Fischer, R. M., & Falconer, A. P. (2001). Voluntariado empresarial - estratégias de empresas no brasil. Revista de Administração, 36(3), 15–27.

27. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakholder Approach. In Journal of Management Studies (Vol. 29). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

28. Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.

29. Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & Abreu, M. C. S. de. (2015). Stakeholder Theory As an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: Applying the theory to multiple contexts. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 17(55), 858. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn

30. Hsieh, J., Curtis, K. P., & Smith, A. W. (2008). Implications of stakeholder concept and market orientation in the US nonprofit arts context. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 5(1), 1–13.

31. Kellner, A., Townsend, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). ‘The mission or the margin?’ A high-performance work system in a non-profit organisation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5192(June), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.11

32. Lee, & Nowell, B. (2015). A Framework for Assessing the Performance of Nonprofit Organizations. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014545828

33. Letts, C. W., Ryan, W. P., & Grossman, A. (1999). High performance nonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: John Wiley.

34. Lovelock, C., & Weinberg, C. (1990). Public and Nonprofit Marketing. Course Technology.

35. Macduff, N., Netting, F. E., & O’Connor, M. K. (2009). Multiple Ways of Coordinating Volunteers With Differing Styles of Service. Journal of Community Practice, 17(4), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705420903300488

36. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like: A Systematic Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86.

37. Mendes, I. D. P. (2007). A dimensão participativa dos cursos de Educação e Formação de Adultos (EFA) no Vale do Ave, norte de Portugal. Universidade de Granada, Granada, Espanha.

38. Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for Value: Organizational Strategy in For-Profit , Nonprofit , and Governmental Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 183–204.

39. Orduna, M. G. (2002). Una aproximación a la educación para a participación social en tercero sector. In Naval Durán - Concepción – participar en la sociedad civil. Navarra EUNSA.

40. Parsons, E., & Broadbridge, A. (2004). Managing Change in Nonprofit Organizations: Insights from the UK Charity Retail Sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000046

41. Parsons, E., & Broadbridge, A. (2007). Charity, retail or care? Gender and managerialism in the charity retail sector. Women in Management Review, 22(7), 552–567.

42. Pavão, Y. M. P., & Rossetto, C. R. (2015). Stakeholder management capability and performance in Brazilian cooperatives. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 17(55), 870–889. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2125

43. Petrescu, C., & Tongel, M. (2006). Views from the Outside: How the Nonprofit Community Characterizes High Performance Nonprofit Organizations. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 18(E/October), 96–107.

44. Płachciak, A. (2009). Sustainable development - The way of building just society. Economics and Sociology, 2(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2009/2-1/10

45. Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., Haddock, M., & Tive, H. S. (2012). Portugal´s Nonprofit Sector in Comparative Context. Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.

46. Saxton, G. D., Kuo, J.-S., & Ho, Y.-C. (2011). The Determinants of Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1051–1071.

47. Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Accountability.org: Online Disclosures by U.S. Nonprofits. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 693–719.

48. Weisinger, J. Y., Borges-Mendez, R., & Milofsky, C. (2016). Diversity in the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(IS), 3S-27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015613568

49. Yasmin, S., Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2014). Communicated Accountability by Faith-Based Charity Organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1759-2

50. Zainon, S., Atan, R., & Wah, Y. B. (2012). Applying Stakeholder Approach in Developing Charity Disclosure Index. Archives Des Sciences, 65(5), 204–229.

51. Zhang, D. Di, & Swanson, L. A. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship in Nonprofit Organizations: An Empirical Investigation of the Synergy Between Social and Business Objectives. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 25(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10