Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Identification of employment increasing possibilities in the context of the EU socioeconomic environment evaluation: The case of Lithuania
Issue: Vol. 11, No 4, 2018
Published date: 12-2018 (print) / 12-2018 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Laima Okuneviciute Neverauskiene
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Ona Grazina Rakauskiene
Mykolas Romeris University
Keywords: employment, unemployment, social exclusion, macroeconomic and fiscal policy, strategic guidelines
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/3
Index PUBMS: b6196d0a-18de-11e9-82eb-fa163e6feac6
Language: English
Pages: 51-68 (18)
JEL classification: D63, O11, O15, J60, J68

Comparative analysis of the EU countries’ socioeconomic indicators is carried out here along with the systematic analysis of the global and the EU strategic documents, the European Commission’s communiqués, the European Commission’s (committees’) and individual working groups’ studies on employment issues. Potential scenarios for increasing employment are considered basing on the analysis of socioeconomic conditions in Lithuania. The article uses the methods of systematic scientific literature analysis, general and logical analysis, comparison, summation and abstraction as well as the mathematical and statistical processing methods. Situation analysis is based on the data of the Eurostat, specialized surveys and the results of statistical calculations. The article substantiates that in order to increase employment, efficient resource allocation and targeted economic policy focused on social problems of the country are needed, and appropriate measures for its implementation are proposed. Employment-friendly macroeconomic policy-making is seen here as a fundamental strategic guideline to address the problems of employment and social economic inequality. Green economy and green jobs’ development are one of the priority directions in increasing employment in Lithuania. Employment policy guidance in green technologies (renewable energy sources, recycling, and green building), the green economy, and promotion of professional skills in this area are recommended. Transition to green economy, eco-villages and ecological communities would be one of the fundamental directions in increasing employment among the most vulnerable groups. Furthermore, regional policies must be intensified in Lithuania to enhance economic (investment) and social attractiveness of less populated areas.


1. Andersen, T.G., & Svarer, M. (2009). Business Cycle Dependent Unemployment Insurance. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. DP7334.

2. Auer, P. (2016). From Security ‘Beyond Employment’ to Security ‘in Employment’. In Den Arbeitsmarkt verstehen, um ihn zu gestalten (pp. 283-300). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

3. Avdagic, S. (2014). Does Deregulation Work? Reassessing the Unemployment Effects of Employment Protection. Retrieved from

4. Avis, J. (2014). Comfort Radicalism and NEETs: A Conservative Praxis. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(3), 272-289.

5. Aysun, U., Bouvet, F., & Hofler, R. (2014). An Alternative Measure of Structural Unemployment. Economic Modelling, 38, 592-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.009.

6. Bagenstos, S. R. (2013). Employment Law and Social Equality. Michigan Law Review, 112(2), 225-273.

7. Bayraktar-Saglam, B., & Boke, S.S. (2017). Labor Cost and Foreign Direct Investment: A Panel VAR Approach. Economies, 5(4), Article Number 36.

8. Berglund, T., & Furaker, B. (2016). Employment Protection Regulation, Trade Unions and Tenure of Employment: An Analysis in 23 European Countries. Industrial Relations Journal, 47 (5-6), 492-512.

9. Bernal-Verdugo, L.E., Furceri, D., & Guillaume, D. (2012). Labor Market Flexibility and Unemployment: New Empirical Evidence of Static and Dynamic Effects. Comparative Economic Studies, 54(2), 251–273.

10. Boadway, R., Song, Z., Tremblay, J.F. (2017). Optimal Income Taxation and Job Choice. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(4), 910-938.

11. Caroli, E., & Godard, M. (2016). Does Job Insecurity Deteriorate Health? Health Economics, 25(2), 131-147.

12. COM. (2012). Joint Employment Report. EC, Briusels, 28.11.2012, 750 final.

13. COM. (2013). Joint Employment Report. EC, Briusels, 13.11.2013, 801 final.

14. COM. (2014). Joint Employment Report. EC, Brussels, 28.11.2014 906 final.

15. COM. (2015). Joint Employment Report. EC, Brussels, 26.11.2015 700 final.

16. COM. (2016). Joint Employment Report. EC, Brussels, 16.11.2016 729 final.

17. COM. (2017). Joint Employment Report. EC, Brussels, 22.11.2017 674 final.

18. Cuyvers, L., De Lombaerde, Ph., & Rayp, G. (2011). The Labour Market Consequences and Regionalisation Introduction. International Journal of Manpower, 32(3), 252–256.

19. Dapontas, D. (2013). Examining Eurozone Crisis and Unemployment Relationship Using Var Models. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 60(2), 241-248.

20. De Lange, M., Gesthuizen, M., & Wolbers, M.H.J. (2014). Youth Labour Market Integration across Europe. European Societies, 16(2), 194-212.

21. Drakaki, M., Papadakis, N., Kyridis, A., & Papargyris, A. (2014). Who’s The Greek Neet? Neet’s Profile in Greece: Parameter, Trends and Common Characteristics of a Heterogeneous Group. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 240-254

22. Europe 2020. (2010). Pažangaus, tvaraus ir integracinio augimo strategija [Smart, sustainable and inclusive growth]. European Commission, COM, 2020 final. Retrieved from

23. Eurostat. Database. Retrieved from

24. Gruževskis, B., & Zabarauskaitė, R. (2012). Social consequences of the economic downturnin Lithuania. Social Development of Lithuania, 1, 5-22.

25. Hairault, L.O., Langot, F., Menard, S., & Sopraseuth, T. (2009). Optimal Unemployment Insurance for Older Workers. Discussion Paper, No. 4071.

26. ILO. (2013). Global Employment Trends 2013: Recovering from a second jobs dip. [Online]. Available at:

27. ILO. (2013a). Jobs, Growth and Social Justice, 9th European Regional Meeting Oslo, April 2013, Report of the Director – General International Labour Office.

28. ILO. (2014). Global Employment Trends 2014: The risk of a jobless recovery. [Online]. Available at: h

29. Jakštienė, S., Purvinis, O., & Susnienė, D. (2013). Analysis of the Most Vulnerable Labour Market Segments during the Period of Economic Development in Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 24(4), 331-342.

30. Klíma, J., & Palát, M. (2015). Development of the Rate of Employment and Unemployment of Males and Females in Ten Associated Countries of EU. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 52(6), 87-104.

31. Kudlyak, M. (2010). Are Wages Rigid Over the Business Cycle? Economic Quarterly, 96(2), 179-199.

32. Kwon, H. S. (2014). Economic Theories of Low-Wage Work. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(1), 61-70. DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2014.844615.

33. Labour Market and Wage Development in Europe. (2016). European Commission. 157 P.

34. Lahusen, C., Scgultz, N., & Graziano, P. R. (2013). Promoting Social Europe? The Development of European Youth Unemployment Policies. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(3), 300-309.

35. Landais, C., Michaillat, P., & Saez, E. (2010). Optimal Unemployment Insurance over the Business Cycle. Working Paper 16526. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. DOI: 10.3386/w16526.

36. Lawy, R., & Wheeler, R. (2013). The Experiences of Long-Term Unemployed Young Adults in the South West of England: Some New Insights. Research in Post – Compulsory Education, 18(1-2), 159-174.

37. Lei, F., & Silos, P. (2012). Wages and Unemployment across Business Cycles: A High-Frequency Investigation. Working Paper Series, 16, 1-34.

38. Maguire, S. (2013). Will Raising the Participation Age in England Solve the NEET Problem? Research in Post - Compulsory Education, 18(1-2), 61-76.

39. Marques, P. (2011). Youth Unemployment in Southern Europe: Social Cohesion at Risk. Multidisciplinary. Doctoral Workshop on “Post-Crisis Post Lisbon Economic and Social Policy: A New Era?”, September, 14-16, Odense, Denmark.

40. Martinkus, B., Stoškus, S., & Beržinskienė, D. (2009). Changes of Employment through the Segmentation of Labour Market in the Baltic States. The Economic Conditions of Enterprise Functioning, Engineering Economics, 63(4), 41-48.

41. Mitev, M.G. (2013). The Impact of the Global Economic Crisis on the Labour Market and Social Services in Macedonia, in: W. Bartlett, M. Uvalić (Eds.), The Social Consequences of the Global Economic Crisis in South East Europe. London School of Economics a

42. Mueller, A. I. (2017). Separations, Sorting and Cyclical Unemployment. Americal Economic Review, 107(7), 2081–2107.

43. Nordlund, M. (2011). Whatworks Best When? The Role of Active Labour Market Policy Programmes in Different Business Cycles. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(1), 43-54.

44. OECD. Database. Retrieved from

45. Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė, L., & Moskvina, J. (2012). Active labour market policy: theory and practice. Monograph. Vilnius: Technika.

46. Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė, L., & Pocius, A. (2011). Trends of Hidden Employment in Lithuania and Problems in Methodical Calculations. Technological and economic development of economy, 17(3), 484-500.

47. Ortego-Marti, V. (2017). The Cyclical Behavior of Unemployment and Vacanciens with Loss of Skilss during Unemployment. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 21(6), 1277–1304.

48. Rhee-Weise, M., Horn, M.B. (2014). Learning to Do” during High Unemployment”. Journal of Higher Education, 4.

49. Rothstein, J. (2011). Unemployment Insurance Job Search in the Great Recession. Working Paper No 17534. NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

50. Statistics Lithuania Database. Retrieved from

51. Tang, B., & Bethencourt, C. (2017). Asymmetric Unemployment-output Tradeoff in the Eurozone. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(3), 461–481.

52. Thompson, F. R. (2014). Bias in the Air: Rethinking Employment Discrimination Law. Stanford Law Review, 66(6), 1381-1421.

53. Todorov, T. (2013). The Social Impact of the Global Crisis in Bulgaria, in: W.Bartlett, M.Uvalić (Eds.), The Social Consequences of the Global Economic Crisis in South East Europe. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). LSEE Research on S

54. Tuzemen, D. (2017). Labour Market Dynamics with Endogenous Labor Force Participation and on-the-Job Seach. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 75, 28–51.

55. Wallace, H., Pollack, M. A., & Young, A. R. (Eds.). (2015). Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford University Press, USA.

56. World Employment Social Outlook (2015). ILO.