Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Work Engagement of Older Employees: do Employee and Work-Related Factors Matter?
Issue: Vol. 10, No 4, 2017
Published date: 12-2017 (print) / 12-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Renata Korsakienė
The General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania

Agota Giedrė Raišienė
Mykolas Romeris University

Monika Bužavaitė
Valuetech s.r.l.
Keywords: work engagement, employee-related factors, work-related factors, older employees, age related factors
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/12
Index PUBMS: bd2e8041-f8fb-11e7-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 151-161 (11)
JEL classification: M10, M12
Website: http://www.economics-sociology.eu/?546,en_work-engagement-of-older-employees-do-employee-and-work-related-factors-matter-
Licenses:
Abstract

Today’s shortage of qualified workers due to population aging and emigration requires putting more emphasis on older employees and also developing specific measures so that to increase their work engagement. However, employers prefer to hire younger individuals who are assumed to be flexible, and more acquainted with new information technologies. Meanwhile, older employees are seen as less engaged in work, less familiar with lifelong learning and also coping with deteriorating health issues. This paper focuses on older employees working in science, education and public organizations of Lithuania. Being grounded on the prevailing theories in this regard, the paper aims to investigate employee- and work-related factors around this problem. The data obtained allows us confirm that work scheduling autonomy, decision-making autonomy, managerial orientation, career achievement, dedication to work, feedback from work influence work engagement of older employees. The study let us develop insights for managers and recommendations for future investigations in the same field.

Bibliography

1. Adams, G. A., Rau, B. L. (2004). Job seeking among retirees seeking bridge employment. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 719-744.

2. Arber, S., Davidson, S., Daly, T., Perren, K. (2003). Older Men: Their Social Worlds and Healthy Lifestyles. NIACE, Leicester, p. 53.

3. Armstrong‐Stassen, A., Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. Journal of occupational and organisational psychology, 82(1), 201-220.

4. Bejtkovský, J. (2016). The Employees of Baby Boomers Generation, Generation X, Generation Y and Generation Z in Selected Czech Corporations as Conceivers of Development and Competitiveness in their Corporation. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(4), 105-123. D

5. Davis, M. A. (2003). Factors related to bridge employment participation among private sector early retirees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(1), 55-71.

6. De Lange, A. H., Taris, T. W., Jansen, P. G. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Houtman, I. L. D., Bongers, P. M. (2010). On the relationships among work characteristics and learning-related behavior: Does age matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 925-950.

7. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2015). World population ageing 2015. Available on Internet: <http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf>.

8. Desmette, D., Gaillard, M. (2008). When a “worker” becomes an “older worker. Career Development International, 13(2), 168-185.

9. Dixon, S. (2003). Implications of population ageing for the labour market. Labour Market Trends, 111(2), 67-76.

10. Eurostat (2016). Employment statistics. Available on Internet: <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_statistics>.

11. Evandrou, M., Glaser, K. (2003). Combining work and family life: the pension penalty of caring. Ageing and Society, 23(5), 583-601.

12. Flynn, M. (2010). Who would delay retirement? Typologies of older workers. Personnel Review, 39(3), 308-324.

13. Goštautaitė, B. (2014). Age, work engagement and individual work performance: the influence of work design. Doctoral Dissertation Vilnius, p. 204. ISBN 978-9955-792-46-8.

14. Goštautaitė, B., Bučiūnienė, I. (2015). The role of work characteristics in enhancing older employees’ performance: evidence from a post-Soviet country. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 757-782.

15. Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332-13

16. James, J. B., McKechnie, S., Swanberg, J. (2011). Predicting employee engagement in an age-diverse retail workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 173-196.

17. Kooij, D., de Lange, A. H., Jansen, P., Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers' motivation to continue to work: five meanings of age. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(4), 364-394.

18. Korsakienė, R., Liučvaitienė, A., Bužavaitė, M., Šimelytė, A. (2017). Intellectual capital as a driving force of internationalization: a case of Lithuanian SMEs. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 4(4), 502-515.

19. Kraak, J. M., Lunardo, R., Herrbach, O., Durrieu, F. (2017). Promises to employees’ matter, self-identity too: Effects of psychological contract breach and older worker identity on violation and turnover intentions. Journal of Business Research, 70, 108-1

20. Lewis, S., Smithson, J. (2006). Final Report on the Project “Gender, Parenthood and the Changing European Workplace: Young Adults Negotiating the Work-Family Boundary: Transitions”, Research Institute for Health and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan

21. Statistics Lithuania (2016). Available on internet: <https://osp.stat.gov.lt/>

22. Loretto, W., White, P. (2006). Work, more work, and retirement: older workers’ perspective. Social Policy & Society, 5(4), 479-483.

23. Mor-Barak, M. E. (1995). The meaning of work for older adults seeking employment: the generativity factor. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(4), 325-344.

24. Morgeson, F. P., Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.

25. Park, J., Gursoy, D. (2012). Generation effects on work engagement among U.S. hotel employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1195-1202.

26. Prakapavičiūtė, J., Korsakienė, R. (2016). The investigation of human capital and investments into human capital: Lithuania in the context of the EU. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 3(4), 350-367.

27. Raišienė, A. G., Korsakienė, R., Lace, N. (2015). How do Inter-institutional Teams Succeed? A Case of National Project. Economics and Sociology, 8(1), 7-18.

28. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. (2010). The conceptualization and measurement of work engagement: A review. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

29. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716.

30. Taipale, S., Selander, K., Anttila, T., Nätti, J. (2011). Work engagement in eight European countries: the role of job demands, autonomy, and social support. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7/8), 486-504.

31. Van Wingerden, J., Derks, D., Bakker, A. B. (2017). The Impact of Personal Resources and Job Crafting Interventions on Work Engagement and Performance. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 51-67.

32. Zaniboni, S., Truxillo, D. M., Fraccaroli, F., McCune, E. A., Bertolino, M. (2014). Who benefits from more tasks? Older versus younger workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 508-523.