Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0

The insignificant amount of Indonesian youths engaging in entrepreneurship has led to the assumption that it is difficult for youths to become entrepreneurs for their lack of capacity to create and innovate, and also their lack of courage to take risks. As a result, there is nearly no study on the capacity of young Indonesian entrepreneurs in maintaining their business continuity. This qualitative research, thus, aims to explore – by using the narrative method – the experiences of six young entrepreneurs in Indonesia when they were in a condition to decide to become an entrepreneur, and the conditions of running a business, with the purpose of understanding the context in which the youths opt to maintain business continuity. The study results indicate that despite being committed to themselves, their businesses, and their social capital, the youths’ motivation to maintain their business continuity varies. More dynamic social conditions and more social relations result in more successful business continuity for it is driven by more superior motivation of young entrepreneurs; conversely, if social conditions are merely formed by internal conditions and fewer social relations, then youths’ motivation to continue their business is low.


1. Archer, M. S. (2004). Being human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2. Atsan, N. (2016). Failure Experiences of Entrepreneurs: Causes and Learning Outcomes. In Mehtap Özşahin (Ed.). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 235: Proceedings of the 12th International Strategic Management Conference, ISMC 2016 (pp. 435-442). A

3. Bennet, R. (2016). Factors contributing to the early failure of small new charity start-ups. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(2), 333 – 348. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-11-2013-0173.

4. Bloom, L. R. (1996). Stories of One’s Own: Nonunitary Subjectivity in Narrative Representation. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. (pp. 289-313). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

5. Boyer, T., & Blazy, R. (2014). Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 669-683. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9522-8.

6. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Hasil Pendaftaran (Listing) Usaha/Perusahaan Sensus Ekonomi 2016. Berita Resmi Statistik (No. 50/4/Th. XX). Retrieved March 3, 2018, from

7. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Statistik Pemuda Indonesia 2016. Retrieved March 3, 2018 from 48e6/statistik-pemuda-indonesia-2016.html.

8. Brock, T., Carrigan, M, & Scambler, G. (2017). Structure, Culture, and Agency: Selected Papers of Margaret Archer. Oxon and New York: Routledge.

9. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 22, 161-177. doi: 10.1002/job.85.

10. Coad, A., Frankish, J. S., Roberts, R. G., & Storey, D. J. (2016). Predicting new venture survival and growth: Does the fog lift? Small Business Economics, 47(1), 217-241. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9713-1.

11. Collins, R. (1980). Weber’s Last Theory of Capitalism: A Systematization. American Sociological Review, 45(6), 925-942. doi: 10.2307/2094910.

12. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

13. Dencker, J. C., Gruber M., & Shah, S. K. (2009). Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms. Organization Science 20(3), 516-537. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0387.

14. Denoo, L., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2015). The impact of business model change on new ventures’ survival. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 35(9), Article 9. Retrieved from

15. Englis, P. D., Ratinho, T., Englis, B. G., & Harms, R. (2010). Extensiveness of Business Planning and Firm Survival: an Examination into the Drivers of Success and Survival for Knowledge Intensive Start-up Firms (Interactive paper). Frontiers of Entrepren

16. Furlong, A and Cartmel, F. (2007). Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives. Berkshire: Open University Press.

17. Grilli, L. (2010). When the going gets tough, do the tough get going? The pre-entry work experience of founders and high-tech start-up survival during an industry crisis. International Small Business Journal, 29(6), 626-647. doi:10.1177/0266242610372845.

18. Gartner, W. B., Starr, J., & Bhat, S. (1999). Predicting new venture survival: an analysis of “anatomy of a start-up.” Cases from inc. Magazine. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(2), 215-232. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00063-3.

19. Huyghebaert, N., Gaeremynck, A., Roodhooft, F., & Van de Gucht, L. M. (2000). New firm survival: start-up characteristics. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(5) & (6), 627-651. doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00328.

20. Korpysa, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial Intentions of Students as the Future Business Leaders. In W. Strielkowski (Ed.) Sustainable Leadership for Entrepreneurs and Academics: 2018 Prague Institute for Qualification Enhancement (PRIZK) International Conferenc

21. Lewin, P. (2012, June). What Do We Know For Certain About Uncertainty? Issues of economic risk and uncertainty. The Legatum Institute Charles Street Symposium, Mayfair, London.

22. Lippman, S., Davis, A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Entrepreneurship and Inequality. In L. A. Keister (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Work (15): Entrepreneurship (pp. 3-31). doi: 10.1016/S0277-2833(05)15002-X.

23. Mishra, A. (2005). Entrepreneurial Motivations in Start-up and Survival of Micro- and Small Enterprises in the Rural Non-Farm Economy. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 18(3), 289-326. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2005.10593345.

24. Mole, K. & Mole, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship as the Structuration of Individual and Opportunity: A Response Using A Critical Realist Perspective: Comment on Sarason, Dean and Dillard. Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (2). 230-237. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent

25. Monk, R. (2000). Why small businesses fail. CMA Management, 74(6), 12-13. Retrieved February 18, 2018, from docview/197767164?accountid=25704.

26. Rahmatiah, Wiroto, D. W., & Taan, H. (2017). A Conceptual Framework in the Formation of Young Entrepreneurs in Indonesia. Junal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 21 (2). 102-116. doi: 10.22146/jsp.30435.

27. Ruef, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Introduction: The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. In M. Ruef and M. Lounsbury (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (25): The Sociology of Entrepreneurship (pp. 1-29). doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(06)25001-8.

28. Thomas, L. C., Possani, E., & Archibald, T. W. (2003). How useful is commonality? Inventory and production decisions to maximize survival probability in start‐ups. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 14(4), 305-320. doi:10.1093/imaman/14.4.305.

29. Williams, C. C., & Nadin, S. (2010). Entrepreneurship and the informal economy: An overview. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 361-378. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2290544.

30. Williams, C. C., & Gurtoo, A. (2012). Evaluating competing theories of street entrepreneurship: some lessons from a study of street vendors in Bangalore, India. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8, 391-409. doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0227

31. Wiroto, D. W. (2016). Kapital sosial dan kepemimpinan dalam pengembangan kompetensi usaha mikro dan kecil di era MEA: sebuah tinjauan konseptual ringkas. In M. Ilyas, R. Junaid, H. Asri. (Eds.). Kesiapan Daerah Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA): P