Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Arising Need of Teachers to Actively Use Project Management Knowledge in Practice: the Case of the Czech Republic
Issue: Vol. 10, No 2, 2017
Published date: 06-2017 (print) / 06-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Martin Januska
University of West Bohemia
Keywords: risk register, education development project, project management education, project management, risk management, teacher education
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/11
Index PUBMS: d5413616-004d-11e8-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 153-164 (12)
JEL classification: G32, H52, O20

ABSTRACT. European Union subsidy policy gives schools the possibility to improve their budgets and fund various education development projects. Projects have to be carried out by teachers, which increases the need for education in the field of project management. To increase the efficiency and success rate of education development projects it is possible to use the risk register presented in this paper. This paper is based on a research project undertaken in the Czech Republic between 2012 and 2013. The main objective of the project was to increase the effectiveness of the realization of education development projects in regional education in the Czech Republic. A risk register is great tool to help inexperienced project managers avoid risks regardless of the methodology used for managing the project. This paper presents a risk register created especially for development education projects funded from public finance and which can be used during teachers’ education.


1. Ambrož, L. (2011). Měření rizika ve financích. Praha: Ekopress.

2. Amura, H. (2008). Behavioral models of decision making under risk and/or uncertainty with application to public sectors. Annual Reviews in Control, 32(1), 99-106.

3. Aram, E., Noble, D. (1999). Educating Prospective Managers in the Complexity of Organisational Life: Teaching and Learning from a Complexity Perspective. Management Learning, 30(3), 321-342.

4. Ashleigh, M., Ojiako, U., Chipulu, M., Wang, J. K. (2012). Critical learning themes in project management education: Implications for blended learning. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2), 153-161.

5. Atkinson, R. (2008). Excellence in teaching and learning project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 221-222.

6. Bryde, D. J. (2003). Project management concepts, methods and application. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(7), 775-793.

7. Buganza, T., Kalchschmidt, M., Bartezzaghi, E., Amabile, D. (2013). Measuring the impact of a major project management educational program: The PMP case in Finmeccanica. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 285-298.

8. Chapman, C. Ward, S. (2007). Managing project risk and uncertainty: a constructively simple approach to decision making. New York: Wiley.

9. Chelst, K., Bodily, S. E. (2000). Structured risk management: filling a gap in decision analysis education. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(12), 1420-1432.

10. Chen, C. A., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Organizational risk aversion: comparing the public and non-profit sectors. Public Management Review, 14(3), 377-402.

11. Chong, P. (1993). Organisational impacts of information systems: a pre-development assessment. Asian Journal of Information Systems, 6 (1993), 109-122.

12. Chraska, M. (2007). Metody pedagogického výzkumu. Praha: Grada Publishing, a.s.

13. Coleman, T. S. (2011). A practical guide to risk management. S.l.: Research Foundation of CFA Institute.

14. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE, London.

15. Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE, London.

16. Davies, A., Brady, T., Prencipe, A., Hobday, M. (2011). Innovation in Complex Products and Systems: Implications for Project-Based Organizing. Advances in Strategic Management, 28, 3-26.

17. Davies, G. B. (2006). Rethinking Risk Attitude: Aspiration as Pure Risk. Theory and Decision, 61(2), 159-190.

18. Doležal, J., Máchal, P., Lacko, B. (2012). Projektový management podle IPMA. Praha: Grada.

19. Eger, L. et al. (2013). Management rizik vzdělávacích projektů. Plzeň: Nava.

20. Egginton, B. (2012). Realising the benefits of investment in project management training: Evidence supporting the need for a more strategic approach. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 508-527.

21. Gavora, P. (2000). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Překlad Vladimír Jůva. Brno: Paido.

22. Gray, D. E. Doing Research in the Real Word. London: SAGE.

23. Hair, J. F., Bush, P. R., Ortinau, J. D. (2000). Marketing research: a practical approach for the new millennium. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

24. Hnilica, J., Fotr, J. (2009). Aplikovaná analýza rizika ve finančním managementu a investičním rozhodování. Praha: Grada.

25. IPMA (2012), Available at:

26. Ives, M. (2005). Identifying the contextual elements of project management within organizations and their impact on project success. Project Management Journal, 36(1), 37-50.

27. Jaafari, A. (2003). Project management in the age of complexity and change. Project Management Journal, 34(4), 47-57.

28. Januška, M., Špicar, R. (2015). Risk management system development: the case of the University of West Bohemia in Pilsen. Actual problems of economics, 267-277. ISSN: 1993-6788.

29. Johnson, J. (2009). CHAOS Summary 2009 Report. The Standish Group International, Inc., White Paper.

30. Kafka, T. (2009). Průvodce pro interní audit a risk management. Praha: C. H. Beck.

31. Kendrick, T. (2009). Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your project. 2nd ed. New York: AMACON.

32. Kerzner, H. R. (2010). Project Management – Best Practices: Achieving Global Excellence. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

33. Kull, T. J. Talluri, S. (2008). A Supply Risk Reduction Model Using Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 409-419.

34. Lamb, D. (2012). Establishing and Maintaining Focus in Your Research: Promoting the use and Effective Implementation of Focus Group Methodology in a 'Real-Life' Research Study. Proceedings of the 11th European conference on research methods, 215-221.

35. Lenfle, S., Loch, C. (2010). Lost Roots: How Project Management Came to Emphasize Control Over Flexibility and Novelty. California Management Review, 53(1), 32-55.

36. Lien, B. Y. H., Hung, R. Y. Y., McLean, G. N. (2007). Training Evaluation Based on Cases of Taiwanese Benchmarked High-Tech Companies. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(1), 35-48.

37. Mazza, R., Berre, A. (2007). Focus group methodology for evaluating information visualization techniques and tools. 11th International Conference on Information Visualization (IV 2007). Zurich, Switzerland, 74-78.

38. McLinden, D. J. (1995). Proof, Evidence, and Complexity: Understanding the Impact of Training and Development in Business. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 3-18.

39. McLoughlin, C., Luca, J. (2002). A learner-centred approach to developing team skills through web-based learning and assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 571-582.

40. McLoughlin, M. W., Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building School-based Teacher Learning Communities: Professional Strategies to Improve Student Achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.

41. Merna, T., Al-Thani, F. F. (2008). Corporate risk management. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

42. Mun, J. (2010). Modeling risk: applying Monte Carlo risk simulation, strategic real options, stochastic forecasting, and portfolio optimization. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

43. Ojiako, U., Ashleigh, M., Chipulu, M., Maguire, S. (2011). Learning and teaching challenges in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 268-278.

44. Ostrom, L. T., Wilhelmsen, Ch. A. (2012). Risk assessment: tools, techniques, and their applications. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

45. Pant, I., Baroudi, B. (2008). Project management education: The human skills imperative. International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 124-128.

46. Pfeifer, Ch. (2010). Risk Aversion and Sorting into Public Sector Employment. German Economic Review, 12(1), 85-99.

47. PMI (2013). Project Management Talent Gap Report. Project Management Institute.

48. Proske, D. (2008). Catalogue of risks: natural, technical, social and health risks. 1st ed. New York: Springer.

49. Punch, K. F. (2008). Úspěšný návrh výzkumu. Praha: Portál.

50. Ramazani, J., Jergeas, G. (2014). Project managers and the journey from good to great: The benefits of investment in project management training and education. International Journal of Project Management – In press.

51. Reichel, J. (2009). Kapitoly metodologie sociálních výzkumů. Praha: Grada.

52. Smejkal, V., Rais, K. (2006). Řízení rizik ve firmách a jiných organizacích. Praha: Grada.

53. Starkweather, J. A., Stevenson, D. H. (2011). PMP® certification as a core competency: Necessary but not sufficient. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 31-41.

54. Tichý, M. (2006). Ovládání rizika: analýza a management. Praha: C.H. Beck.

55. Wang, G. (2003). Valuing Learning: The Measurement Journey. Educational Technology, 43(1), 32-37.

56. Wiersma, W., Jurs, G. S. (2009). Research methods in education. Boston: Pearson Education.

57. Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, E., Conyon, M. (1999). Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992-1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583-600.

58. Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P., Cicmil, S. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 638-649.

59. Zimmerer, T. W., Yasin, M. M. (1998). A leadership profile of American project managers. Project Management Journal, 21(1), 31-38.