Economics & Sociology

ISSN: 2071-789X eISSN: 2306-3459 DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X
Index PUBMS: f5512f57-a601-11e7-8f0e-080027f4daa0
Article information
Title: Smart Growth as a Tool for Regional Convergence: Evidence from Latgale Region of Latvia
Issue: Vol. 10, No 4, 2017
Published date: 12-2017 (print) / 12-2017 (online)
Journal: Economics & Sociology
ISSN: 2071-789X, eISSN: 2306-3459
Authors: Elita Jermolajeva
Latvia University of Agriculture

Baiba Rivža
Latvia University of Agriculture

Ludmila Ludmila
Daugavpils University

Viktorija Šipilova
Daugavpils University

Inta Ostrovska
Daugavpils University
Keywords: regional development, smart development and specialisation, Latgale rural municipalities of Latvia
DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/16
Index PUBMS: fc71aec9-f90d-11e7-94c4-fa163e5d4f72
Language: English
Pages: 203-224 (22)
JEL classification: O18, R11
Website: http://www.economics-sociology.eu/?550,en_smart-growth-as-a-tool-for-regional-convergence-evidence-from-latgale-region-of-latvia
Licenses:
Abstract

One of the basic principles of the European Union functioning is even and balanced regional development. However, considerable socioeconomic disparities can be still observed across the regions in Latvia, with its monocentric, i.e., capital city-oriented, distribution of people and economic activities instead of a polycentric one. This factor negatively affects the development of the country’s regions. According to the NUTS classification of the European Union, Latvia represents a NUTS 3 region, yet there are five planning regions and six statistical regions in country, and the overall situation along with internal processes in these regions are radically different. Within the framework of the Latvian National Programme EKOSOC-LV, the present paper focuses on smart growth as a tool for regional convergence to be applied in the context of regional development. A new Smart Development Index was created and the Analytic Hierarchy Process was employed to analyse one of the regions in Latvia – Latgale and its 19 municipalities focusing on the expansion of local entrepreneurial activity and the important role of innovative high-tech enterprises in it.

Bibliography

1. Arcelus, FJ, Arocena, P., Cabases, F., Pascual P. (2015). On the Cost-Efficiency of Service Delivery in Small Municipalities. Regional Studies, 49(9), 1469-1480.

2. Álvarez, M. J., Fernández, R. I., Romera, R. (2014). Is eco-innovation a smart specialization strategy for andalusia? One approach from the multivariate analysis (Es la eco-innovación una estrategia in-teligente de especialización para Anda-lucía? Una apr

3. Bachtler, J, Martins, J. O, Wostner, P., Zuber, P. (2017). Towards Cohesion Policy 4.0: Structural Transformation and Inclusive Growth RSA Europe. Brussels. Regional Studies Association, 86 p.

4. Casado, H. (2014). How to boost innovation from public administration. (Cómo impulsar la innovación desde la Administración Publica). Revista de Obras Publicas, 161(3550), 31-34.

5. Chmielewska, B., Horváthová, Z. (2016). Policy levelling economic and social inequalities between rural and urban areas. Journal of International Studies, 9(2), 103-111.

6. Copus, A., Noguera, J. (2010). A Typology of intermediate and Predominantly Rural NUTS 3 Regions. The ESPON 2013 Programme Applied Research Project 2013/1/2. EDORA (European Development Opportunities for Rural Areas). Version 4, 17 September 2010.

7. CSP [Data of Central Statistical Bureu of Latvia]. Retrieved during the June-August, 2017, from http://data.csb.gov.lv.

8. Di Leo, S., Salvia, M. (2017). Local strategies and action plans towards resource efficiency in South East Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 286-305.

9. European Comission (2012). Connecting Smart and Sustainable Growth through Smart Specialization. A practical guide for ERDE managing authorities.

10. European Union. General Directorate for Regional Policy (2011). Cities of Tomorrow – Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward. Retrieved July, 12, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/citiesoftomorrow/citiesoftomorrow_final

11. Eurostat, 2008-2010. Seventh Community Innovation Survey: Highest proportions of innovative enterprises in Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium. Retrieved July, 20, 2017, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STAT-13-5_en.htm.

12. ESPON (2013). Programme Applied Research Project 2013/1/2. EDORA (European Development Opportunities for Rural Areas). Version 4. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from http://www.nordregio.se/Global/Research/EDORA/EDORA_2.22.pdf.

13. GDP at regional level. Retrieved 7 July 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/GDP_at_regional_ level# Regional_GDP_per_capita.

14. Jermolajeva, E., Cingule-Vinogradova, S. (2012). Potential of Latgale Region and Directions of the Development. ‚Economic Science for Rural Development‘ Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Integrated and Sustainable Development, No.27.

15. Habánik, J., Kordoš, M., & Hošták, P. (2016). Competitiveness of Slovak Economy and Regional Development Policies. Journal of International Studies, 9(1), 144-155.

16. Kreslins, K., Stefenberga, D. (2016). Analysis of Kurzeme region development in the context of smart specialization strategy: Preliminary results. Engineering for Rural Development, 2016, January, 1224-1229.

17. Latvijas reģionu ekonomikas attīstības perspektīvas un virzieni 2010.-2011. Autoru kolektīvs Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmijas Ekonomikas institūts, 303 lpp. Retrieved July 13, 2017, from http://www.varam.gov.lv/lat/publ/ publikacijas/reg_att/?doc=13880.

18. Latgales plānošanas reģions. Retrieved June 12, 2017, from https://lpr.gov.lv/lv/padome-l2f3/#.Wa1ToPNJbIU.

19. Latgales programma 2010-2017 (2010a). Rīcības programma, 97 lpp. Retrieved June 12, 2017, from https://lpr.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2011/lpr-planosanas-dokumenti/ Latgales-programma_01.12.2010 _apstipr.LPR.pdf.

20. Latgales stratēģija 2030 (2010b). 20 lpp. Retrieved June 12, 2017, from https://lpr.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2011/lpr-planosanas-dokumenti/Latgales_strategija_2030_apstiprinata _01.12.2010.pdf.

21. Lursoft (Database of enterprises in Latvia), www.lursoft.lv.

22. McCann, P. and Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). ‘Why and When Development Policy Should Be Place-Based?’ OECD Observer 14. 2011: Building Resilient Regions for Stronger Economies, 203-213.

23. Melbarde, V., Ore, M. (2016). Influencing factors of rural areas development: Vidzeme region case analysis. Proceedings of the New Challenges of Economic and Business Development, 484-495.

24. Molavi, J., Shapoorian, B. (2013). Sustainable infrastructure: A framework a for sustainable municipality. ICSDEC 2012: Developing the Frontier of Sustainable Design, Engineering, and Construction – Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Sust

25. Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., & Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90-101. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006.

26. Partridge, MD, Rickman, DS, Olfert, MR, Tan, Y. (2015). When Spatial Equilibrium Fails: Is Place-Based Policy Second Best? Regional Studies, 49(8), 1303-1325.

27. Pašvaldību budžeta kapacitātes rādītāja aktuālās vērtības. Valsts Reģionālās attīstības aģentūra, Retrieved August 4, 2017, from http://www.vraa.gov.lv/lv/publikacijas/pbkr.

28. Reģionālās politikas pamatnostādnes 2013.-2019.gadam (informatīvā daļa) (2013.), Rīga, p. 5 (pp. 95).

29. Rutkauskas, A. V., Raudeliuniene, J., & Racinskaja, I. (2014). Integral Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Cluster Formation Nurturing the Universal Development Sustainability in the Context of Globalization. Economics and Sociology, 7(4), 41.

30. Saaty, TL (1990). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York.

31. Sandu, A.-M. (2014). Coordinates of the new EU rural development policy. Quality – Access to Success, 15(SUPPL.1), 463-465.

32. Sinkiene, J., Grumadaite, K., & Liugailaite-Radzvickiene, L. (2014). Diversity of theoretical approaches to the concept of smart city. Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Business and Management 2014, 15-16 May 2014 (pp. 933-940). V

33. Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities (2007). Final report, October 2007. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_ cities_final_report.pdf.

34. State Regional Development Agency (SRDA) (2010). Development of Regions in Latvia 2009. Annex 4: Development Indexes of the Planning Regions and Administrative Territories Existing since July 1, 2009. Available: http://www.vraa.gov.lv/ uploads/Development

35. State Regional Development Agency (SRDA) (2011). Development of Regions in Latvia 2010. Annex 2: Planning Region, Republican City and Novads Territory Development Indexes. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from http://www.vraa.gov.lv/ uploads/Development_of_Regi

36. State Regional Development Agency (SRDA) (2012). Development of Regions in Latvia 2011. Annex 2: Territorial Development Indices of Planning Regions, Cities and Municipalities. Retrieved August, 17, 2017, from http://www.vraa.gov.lv/uploads/regionu%20pars

37. Steiner, M., & Mossbock, J. (2014). How “smart” are rural areas? A case study approach. RSA Winter Conference 2014, 27-28 November 2014, London, UK. Retrieved 20 July 2016, from http://www.regionalstudies.org/uploads/funding/conferences/presentations/ Win

38. Šipilova, V., Ostrovska, I., Aleksejeva, L., Jermolajeva, E., Oļehnovičs, D. (2017a). A Review of the Literature on Smart Development: Lessons for Small Municipalities. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2017, 7(1), 460-469.

39. Šipilova, V., Ostrovska, I., Jermolajeva, E., Aleksejeva, L., Oļehnovičs, D. (2017b). Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Rural Territories in Latgale Region (Latvia) by Using the Conception of Smart Specialisation. Journal of teacher Education for S

40. Šipilova, V., Aleksejeva, V., Ostrovska, I. (2016). Testing the Approaches of Regional Development in Small Municipalities. IBIMA Publishing Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/ JEERBE/jeerbe

41. Straka, J., Birčiaková, N., Stávková, J. (2015). Impact of SMEs on Standards of Living of Czech Rural Households. Economics and Sociology, 8(4), 51-64

42. Territory Development Index. State Regional Development Agency Republic of Latvia. http://www.vraa.gov.lv/en/reasearch/.

43. Valsts pētījumu programma 5.2. „tautsaimniecības transformācija, gudra izaugsme, pārvaldība un tiesiskais ietvars valsts un sabiedrības ilgtspējīgai attīstībai – jaunas pieejas ilgtspējīgas zināšanu sabiedrības veidošanai (EKOSOC-LV)” (2014). Retrieved Ju

44. Vanthillo, T., & Verhetsel, A. (2012). Paradigm change in regional policy: Towards smart specialisation? Lessons from Flanders (Belgium). Belgeo, 1-2 (2012), Inaugural Issue. Retrieved 13 April 2016, from https://belgeo.revues.org/pdf/7083. DOI: 10.4000/b

45. Zvirbule, A., Rivza, B., Bulderberga, Z. (2016). Determinant Factors for the Formation and Development of a Smart Territory. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017 E. Lau et al. (eds.), Selected Papers from the Asia-Pacific Conference on Economics & Fina